ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Mistral Medium 3 vs DeepSeek V3 0324

Too close to call on our weighted score (DeepSeek V3 0324 54, Mistral Medium 3 53). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Mistral AI

    Mistral Medium 3

    Released May 7, 2025

    53/100
    • ECI134.1
    • Price$0.40 / $2.00
    • Context131K
  2. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek V3 0324

    Released Mar 24, 2025

    54/100
    • ECI135.9
    • Price$0.24 / $0.90
    • Context164K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (DeepSeek V3 0324 54/100, Mistral Medium 3 53/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek V3 0324 for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityDeepSeek V3 0324Capabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek V3 0324 135.9 · Mistral Medium 3 134.1
  • Lowest priceDeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek V3 0324 $0.405 · Mistral Medium 3 $0.80 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextDeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek V3 0324 163,840 · Mistral Medium 3 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsMistral Medium 3Mistral Medium 3: Text, Images · DeepSeek V3 0324: Text
  • Self-hostingDeepSeek V3 0324Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMistral Medium 3DeepSeek V3 0324
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%5860
Price25%5468
Inputs & features15%5025
Context window10%2428
Overall100%53/10054/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mistral Medium 3 vs DeepSeek V3 0324 specifications side by side
SpecificationMistral Medium 3Mistral AIDeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)134.1135.9 (best)
ECI rank#117 of 148#114 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions59.5%67.6% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics32.2%37.8% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$0.40$0.24 (best)
Output$2.00$0.90 (best)
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.80$0.405 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 5 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens163,840 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens163,840 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpen
API model IDmistral-medium-2505—
API providers55
ReleasedMay 7, 2025Mar 24, 2025
Knowledge cutoffMay 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mistral Medium 3$8.00
  • DeepSeek V3 0324$4.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mistral Medium 3 or DeepSeek V3 0324?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (DeepSeek V3 0324 54/100, Mistral Medium 3 53/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek V3 0324 for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3 or DeepSeek V3 0324?

DeepSeek V3 0324 is cheaper at $0.24 input / $0.90 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.405 per million tokens for DeepSeek V3 0324 versus $0.80 for Mistral Medium 3 (2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

DeepSeek V3 0324 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek V3 0324 135.9 (#114 of 148) and Mistral Medium 3 134.1 (#117 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (132.4–138.0 vs 130.5–135.6), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — DeepSeek V3 0324 67.6%, Mistral Medium 3 59.5%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — DeepSeek V3 0324 37.8%, Mistral Medium 3 32.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Medium 3 and DeepSeek V3 0324 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, DeepSeek V3 0324 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V3 0324 has the largest context window at 163,840 tokens, against 131,072 for Mistral Medium 3. Maximum output per response: Mistral Medium 3 up to 131,072, DeepSeek V3 0324 up to 163,840 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mistral Medium 3 accepts text and images; DeepSeek V3 0324 accepts text. Mistral Medium 3 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

DeepSeek V3 0324 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Mistral Medium 3 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Mistral Medium 3 is the newest, released May 7, 2025. DeepSeek V3 0324 came out Mar 24, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Medium 3 May 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.