Mistral Medium 3 vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs GPT-4.1 mini
Too close to call on our weighted score (Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 62, GPT-4.1 mini 60, Mistral Medium 3 53). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Mistral AIMistral Medium 3
53/100- ECI134.1
- Price$0.40 / $2.00
- Context131K
MetaLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct
62/100- ECI129.7
- Price$0.225 / $0.69
- Context10M
OpenAIGPT-4.1 mini
60/100- ECI135.0
- Price$0.40 / $1.60
- Context1.05M
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 62/100, GPT-4.1 mini 60/100, Mistral Medium 3 53/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-4.1 mini for raw capability, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct on price and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGPT-4.1 miniCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4.1 mini 135.0 · Mistral Medium 3 134.1 · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7
- Lowest priceLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct $0.341 · GPT-4.1 mini $0.70 · Mistral Medium 3 $0.80 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 10,000,000 · GPT-4.1 mini 1,047,576 · Mistral Medium 3 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-4.1 miniMistral Medium 3: Text, Images · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct: Text, Images · GPT-4.1 mini: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Mistral Medium 3 | Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 58 | 52 | 59 |
| Price | 25% | 54 | 72 | 57 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 50 | 50 | 70 |
| Context window | 10% | 24 | 100 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 53/100 | 62/100 | 60/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Mistral Medium 3Mistral AI | Llama 4 Scout 17B InstructMeta | GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 134.1 | 129.7 | 135.0 (best) |
| ECI rank | #117 of 148 | #126 of 148 | #115 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 59.5% | 51.8% | 65.9% (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | — | 6.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 32.2% | 7.8% | 44.7% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | — | 12.7% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.40 | $0.225 (best) | $0.40 |
| Output | $2.00 | $0.69 (best) | $1.60 |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.10 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.80 | $0.341 (best) | $0.70 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Mistral API | Median of 4 providers | Official OpenAI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 10,000,000 tokens (best) | 1,047,576 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | mistral-medium-2505 | — | gpt-4.1-mini |
| API providers | 5 | 4 | 24 (best) |
| Released | May 7, 2025 | Apr 5, 2025 | Apr 14, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2025 | Aug 2024 | Apr 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Mistral Medium 3$8.00
- Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct$3.63
- GPT-4.1 mini$7.20
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Mistral Medium 3, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct or GPT-4.1 mini?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 62/100, GPT-4.1 mini 60/100, Mistral Medium 3 53/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-4.1 mini for raw capability, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct on price and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct or GPT-4.1 mini?
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is cheaper at $0.225 input / $0.69 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). GPT-4.1 mini costs $0.40 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.341 per million tokens for Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct versus $0.70 for GPT-4.1 mini (2.1× as much) and $0.80 for Mistral Medium 3 (2.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GPT-4.1 mini scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4.1 mini 135.0 (#115 of 148), Mistral Medium 3 134.1 (#117 of 148) and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7 (#126 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (131.2–136.6 vs 130.5–135.6), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GPT-4.1 mini 65.9%, Mistral Medium 3 59.5%, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 51.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-4.1 mini 44.7%, Mistral Medium 3 32.2%, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 7.8%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Medium 3, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct and GPT-4.1 mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-4.1 mini leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct has the largest context window at 10,000,000 tokens, against 1,047,576 for GPT-4.1 mini and 131,072 for Mistral Medium 3. Maximum output per response: Mistral Medium 3 up to 131,072, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct up to 16,384, GPT-4.1 mini up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Mistral Medium 3 accepts text and images; Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct accepts text and images; GPT-4.1 mini accepts text, images and PDFs. GPT-4.1 mini handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Mistral Medium 3 and GPT-4.1 mini is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Mistral Medium 3 is the newest, released May 7, 2025. GPT-4.1 mini came out Apr 14, 2025; Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct came out Apr 5, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Medium 3 May 2025, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct Aug 2024, GPT-4.1 mini Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Mistral Medium 3 vs QwQ 32BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 137.6
- Mistral Medium 3 vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMeta · ECI 132.2
- Mistral Medium 3 vs DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek · ECI 135.9
- Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI · ECI 127.5
- Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs DeepSeek-V3DeepSeek · ECI 132.3
- Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs Gemma 3 27B ITGoogle · ECI 130.0
