ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Mistral Large 4 vs Muse Spark 1.1 vs Inkling Small

Too close to call on our weighted score (Muse Spark 1.1 69, Inkling Small 68, Mistral Large 4 67). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Mistral AI

    Mistral Large 4

    Released Oct 6, 2026NewBeta

    67/100
    • ECI150.6
    • Price$0.70 / $2.10
    • Context1.05M
  2. Meta

    Muse Spark 1.1

    Released Jul 9, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI154.2
    • Price$1.25 / $4.25
    • Context1.05M
  3. Thinking Machines

    Inkling Small

    Released Jul 30, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI150.5
    • Price$0.58 / $1.44
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Muse Spark 1.1 69/100, Inkling Small 68/100, Mistral Large 4 67/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Muse Spark 1.1 for raw capability and Inkling Small on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityMuse Spark 1.1Capabilities Index (ECI): Muse Spark 1.1 154.2 · Mistral Large 4 150.6 · Inkling Small 150.5
  • Lowest priceInkling SmallInkling Small $0.795 · Mistral Large 4 $1.05 · Muse Spark 1.1 $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameMistral Large 4 1,048,576 · Muse Spark 1.1 1,048,576 · Inkling Small 1,048,576 tokens
  • Widest inputsMuse Spark 1.1Mistral Large 4: Text, Images · Muse Spark 1.1: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Inkling Small: Text, Images, Audio
  • Self-hostingInkling SmallPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMistral Large 4Muse Spark 1.1Inkling Small
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%778277
Price25%473452
Inputs & features15%709070
Context window10%616161
Overall100%67/10069/10068/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mistral Large 4 vs Muse Spark 1.1 vs Inkling Small specifications side by side
SpecificationMistral Large 4Mistral AIMuse Spark 1.1MetaInkling SmallThinking Machines
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)150.6154.2 (best)150.5
ECI rank#57 of 165#46 of 165 (best)#58 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions88.1%—88.5% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics58.6% (best)—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics98.3% (best)—90.0%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions20.0%57.8% (best)19.1%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.70$1.25$0.58 (best)
Output$2.10$4.25$1.44 (best)
Cached input$0.07 (best)$0.15$0.116
Blended (3:1)$1.05$2.00$0.795 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIOfficial Meta APIOfficial Thinking Machines API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output262,144 tokens131,072 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoYesNo
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · highYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhighYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpenApache-2.0
API model IDmistral-large-4muse-spark-1.1thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small
API providers15 (best)15 (best)12
ReleasedOct 6, 2026Jul 9, 2026Jul 30, 2026
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mistral Large 4$11.20
  • Muse Spark 1.1$21.00
  • Inkling Small$8.68
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mistral Large 4, Muse Spark 1.1 or Inkling Small?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Muse Spark 1.1 69/100, Inkling Small 68/100, Mistral Large 4 67/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Muse Spark 1.1 for raw capability and Inkling Small on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 4, Muse Spark 1.1 or Inkling Small?

Inkling Small is cheaper at $0.58 input / $1.44 output per million tokens (official Thinking Machines API price). Mistral Large 4 costs $0.70 input / $2.10 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.795 per million tokens for Inkling Small versus $1.05 for Mistral Large 4 (1.3× as much) and $2.00 for Muse Spark 1.1 (2.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Muse Spark 1.1 154.2 (#46 of 165), Mistral Large 4 150.6 (#57 of 165) and Inkling Small 150.5 (#58 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (151.3–156.4 vs 147.4–153.5), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: SimpleQA Verified — Muse Spark 1.1 57.8%, Mistral Large 4 20.0%, Inkling Small 19.1%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Large 4, Muse Spark 1.1 and Inkling Small yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Muse Spark 1.1 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Large 4, Muse Spark 1.1 and Inkling Small share the same 1,048,576-token context window. Maximum output per response: Mistral Large 4 up to 262,144, Muse Spark 1.1 up to 131,072, Inkling Small up to 1,048,576 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mistral Large 4 accepts text and images; Muse Spark 1.1 accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Inkling Small accepts text, images and audio. Muse Spark 1.1 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Inkling Small publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Mistral Large 4 and Muse Spark 1.1 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Mistral Large 4 is the newest, released Oct 6, 2026. Inkling Small came out Jul 30, 2026; Muse Spark 1.1 came out Jul 9, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.