ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Inkling Small

Too close to call on our weighted score (Muse Spark 1.1 69, Inkling Small 68). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Meta

    Muse Spark 1.1

    Released Jul 9, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI154.2
    • Price$1.25 / $4.25
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove Muse Spark 1.1

  2. Thinking Machines

    Inkling Small

    Released Jul 30, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI150.5
    • Price$0.58 / $1.44
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove Inkling Small

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Muse Spark 1.1 69/100, Inkling Small 68/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Muse Spark 1.1 for raw capability and Inkling Small on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityMuse Spark 1.1Capabilities Index (ECI): Muse Spark 1.1 154.2 · Inkling Small 150.5
  • Lowest priceInkling SmallInkling Small $0.795 · Muse Spark 1.1 $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameMuse Spark 1.1 1,048,576 · Inkling Small 1,048,576 tokens
  • Widest inputsMuse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.1: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Inkling Small: Text, Images, Audio
  • Self-hostingInkling SmallPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMuse Spark 1.1Inkling Small
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%8277
Price25%3452
Inputs & features15%9070
Context window10%6161
Overall100%69/10068/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Inkling Small specifications side by side
SpecificationMuse Spark 1.1MetaInkling SmallThinking Machines
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)154.2 (best)150.5
ECI rank#46 of 165 (best)#58 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—88.5%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—90.0%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions57.8% (best)19.1%
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25$0.58 (best)
Output$4.25$1.44 (best)
Cached input$0.15$0.116 (best)
Blended (3:1)$2.00$0.795 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Meta APIOfficial Thinking Machines API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsYesNo
AudioNoYes
VideoYesNo
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhighYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenApache-2.0
API model IDmuse-spark-1.1thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small
API providers15 (best)12
ReleasedJul 9, 2026Jul 30, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Muse Spark 1.1$21.00
  • Inkling Small$8.68
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Muse Spark 1.1 or Inkling Small?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Muse Spark 1.1 69/100, Inkling Small 68/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Muse Spark 1.1 for raw capability and Inkling Small on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Inkling Small?

Inkling Small is cheaper at $0.58 input / $1.44 output per million tokens (official Thinking Machines API price). Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.795 per million tokens for Inkling Small versus $2.00 for Muse Spark 1.1 (2.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Muse Spark 1.1 154.2 (#46 of 165) and Inkling Small 150.5 (#58 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (151.3–156.4 vs 147.7–152.4), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: SimpleQA Verified — Muse Spark 1.1 57.8%, Inkling Small 19.1%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Muse Spark 1.1 and Inkling Small yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Muse Spark 1.1 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.1 and Inkling Small share the same 1,048,576-token context window. Maximum output per response: Muse Spark 1.1 up to 131,072, Inkling Small up to 1,048,576 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Muse Spark 1.1 accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Inkling Small accepts text, images and audio. Muse Spark 1.1 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Inkling Small publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Muse Spark 1.1 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Inkling Small is the newest, released Jul 30, 2026. Muse Spark 1.1 came out Jul 9, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons