ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

MiniMax M1 80K vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Morph V3 Fast

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite comes out ahead, 83 to 47 and 32 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. MiniMax

    MiniMax M1 80K

    Released Jun 17, 2025

    47/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.55 / $2.20
    • Context1M
  2. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

    Released Jun 17, 2025

    83/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.40
    • Context1.05M
  3. Morph

    Morph V3 Fast

    Released Jul 7, 2025

    32/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.80 / $1.20
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is our pick

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against MiniMax M1 80K (47) and Morph V3 Fast (32). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite $0.175 · Morph V3 Fast $0.90 · MiniMax M1 80K $0.963 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 1,048,576 · MiniMax M1 80K 1,000,000 · Morph V3 Fast 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMiniMax M1 80K: Text · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Morph V3 Fast: Text
  • Self-hostingMiniMax M1 80KPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMiniMax M1 80KGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMorph V3 Fast
Price50%488250
Inputs & features30%351000
Context window20%606137
Overall100%47/10083/10032/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

MiniMax M1 80K vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Morph V3 Fast specifications side by side
SpecificationMiniMax M1 80KMiniMaxGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogleMorph V3 FastMorph
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.55$0.10 (best)$0.80
Output$2.20$0.40 (best)$1.20
Cached input—$0.01—
Blended (3:1)$0.963$0.175 (best)$0.90
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 5 providersOfficial Google APIMedian of 5 providers
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)262,144 tokens
Max output80,000 tokens65,536 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesNo
PDFsNoYesNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYesYesNo
Tool callingYesYesNo
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenApache-2.0ProprietaryProprietary
API model ID—gemini-2.5-flash-lite—
API providers524 (best)5
ReleasedJun 17, 2025Jun 17, 2025Jul 7, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Jan 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • MiniMax M1 80K$9.90
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite$1.80
  • Morph V3 Fast$10.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: MiniMax M1 80K, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Morph V3 Fast?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against MiniMax M1 80K (47) and Morph V3 Fast (32). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 80K, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Morph V3 Fast?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Google API price). Morph V3 Fast costs $0.80 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers); MiniMax M1 80K costs $0.55 input / $2.20 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite versus $0.90 for Morph V3 Fast (5.1× as much) and $0.963 for MiniMax M1 80K (5.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiniMax M1 80K has not been scored yet, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has not been scored yet and Morph V3 Fast has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax M1 80K, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Morph V3 Fast yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Morph V3 Fast does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for MiniMax M1 80K and 262,144 for Morph V3 Fast. Maximum output per response: MiniMax M1 80K up to 80,000, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite up to 65,536, Morph V3 Fast up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

MiniMax M1 80K accepts text; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Morph V3 Fast accepts text. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

MiniMax M1 80K publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Morph V3 Fast is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Morph V3 Fast is the newest, released Jul 7, 2025. MiniMax M1 80K came out Jun 17, 2025; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite came out Jun 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.