ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

MiMo-V2-Pro vs Mistral Small 4 vs Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)

Mistral Small 4 comes out ahead, 65 to 52 and 42 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Xiaomi

    MiMo-V2-Pro

    Released Mar 18, 2026

    42/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $3.00
    • Context1.05M
  2. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Mistral Small 4

    Released Mar 16, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.60
    • Context256K
  3. xAI

    Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)

    Released Mar 9, 2026

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.25 / $2.50
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Mistral Small 4 is our pick

Mistral Small 4 is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) (52) and MiMo-V2-Pro (42). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMistral Small 4Mistral Small 4 $0.263 · MiMo-V2-Pro $1.50 · Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) $1.56 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMiMo-V2-ProMiMo-V2-Pro 1,048,576 · Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) 1,000,000 · Mistral Small 4 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)MiMo-V2-Pro: Text · Mistral Small 4: Text, Images · Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingMistral Small 4Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMiMo-V2-ProMistral Small 4Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
Price50%407439
Inputs & features30%357070
Context window20%613660
Overall100%42/10065/10052/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

MiMo-V2-Pro vs Mistral Small 4 vs Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) specifications side by side
SpecificationMiMo-V2-ProXiaomiMistral Small 4Mistral AIGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)xAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.00$0.15 (best)$1.25
Output$3.00$0.60 (best)$2.50
Cached input—$0.015 (best)$0.20
Blended (3:1)$1.50$0.263 (best)$1.56
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $5.00
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial Mistral APIOfficial xAI API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)256,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens256,000 tokens (best)30,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYeshighNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model ID—mistral-small-2603grok-4.20-0309-non-reasoning
API providers221 (best)13
ReleasedMar 18, 2026Mar 16, 2026Mar 9, 2026
Knowledge cutoffDec 2024Jun 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • MiMo-V2-Pro$16.00
  • Mistral Small 4$2.70
  • Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)$17.50
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: MiMo-V2-Pro, Mistral Small 4 or Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)?

Mistral Small 4 is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) (52) and MiMo-V2-Pro (42). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro, Mistral Small 4 or Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)?

Mistral Small 4 is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1.00 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) costs $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for Mistral Small 4 versus $1.50 for MiMo-V2-Pro (5.7× as much) and $1.56 for Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) (6× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiMo-V2-Pro has not been scored yet, Mistral Small 4 has not been scored yet and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2-Pro, Mistral Small 4 and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) and 256,000 for Mistral Small 4. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2-Pro up to 131,072, Mistral Small 4 up to 256,000, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) up to 30,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

MiMo-V2-Pro accepts text; Mistral Small 4 accepts text and images; Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) accepts text, images and PDFs. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Mistral Small 4 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; MiMo-V2-Pro and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is proprietary.

Which is newer?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the newest, released Mar 18, 2026. Mistral Small 4 came out Mar 16, 2026; Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) came out Mar 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2-Pro Dec 2024, Mistral Small 4 Jun 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.