MiMo-V2-Pro vs Grok Build 0.1
Grok Build 0.1 comes out ahead, 53 to 42 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
XiaomiMiMo-V2-Pro
42/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $3.00
- Context1.05M
- Our pick
xAIGrok Build 0.1
53/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $2.00
- Context256K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Grok Build 0.1 is our pick
Grok Build 0.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 53/100 against MiMo-V2-Pro (42). It leads on price and inputs & features. MiMo-V2-Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGrok Build 0.1Grok Build 0.1 $1.25 · MiMo-V2-Pro $1.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2-ProMiMo-V2-Pro 1,048,576 · Grok Build 0.1 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGrok Build 0.1MiMo-V2-Pro: Text · Grok Build 0.1: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | MiMo-V2-Pro | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 40 | 43 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 42/100 | 53/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiMo-V2-ProXiaomi | Grok Build 0.1xAI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.00 | $1.00 |
| Output | $3.00 | $2.00 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.20 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.50 | $1.25 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 200K: $2.00 / $4.00 |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official xAI API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | grok-build-0.1 |
| API providers | 2 | 20 (best) |
| Released | Mar 18, 2026 | Apr 16, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiMo-V2-Pro$16.00
- Grok Build 0.1$14.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiMo-V2-Pro or Grok Build 0.1?
Grok Build 0.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 53/100 against MiMo-V2-Pro (42). It leads on price and inputs & features. MiMo-V2-Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Grok Build 0.1?
Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $1.00 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1.00 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.25 per million tokens for Grok Build 0.1 versus $1.50 for MiMo-V2-Pro (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. MiMo-V2-Pro has not been scored yet and Grok Build 0.1 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2-Pro and Grok Build 0.1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 256,000 for Grok Build 0.1. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2-Pro up to 131,072, Grok Build 0.1 up to 256,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiMo-V2-Pro accepts text; Grok Build 0.1 accepts text, images and PDFs. Grok Build 0.1 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. MiMo-V2-Pro and Grok Build 0.1 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Grok Build 0.1 is the newest, released Apr 16, 2026. MiMo-V2-Pro came out Mar 18, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2-Pro Dec 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Three-way comparison
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)xAI
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs GLM-5-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs Relace SearchRelace
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogle
- Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen)
- Grok Build 0.1 vs Macaron V1 VentiMindlab
