MiMo-V2-Pro vs GPT-5.1 Codex mini
GPT-5.1 Codex mini comes out ahead, 54 to 42 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
XiaomiMiMo-V2-Pro
42/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $3.00
- Context1.05M
- Our pick
OpenAIGPT-5.1 Codex mini
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $2.00
- Context400K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
GPT-5.1 Codex mini is our pick
GPT-5.1 Codex mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against MiMo-V2-Pro (42). It leads on price and inputs & features. MiMo-V2-Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGPT-5.1 Codex miniGPT-5.1 Codex mini $0.688 · MiMo-V2-Pro $1.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2-ProMiMo-V2-Pro 1,048,576 · GPT-5.1 Codex mini 400,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-5.1 Codex miniMiMo-V2-Pro: Text · GPT-5.1 Codex mini: Text, Images
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | MiMo-V2-Pro | GPT-5.1 Codex mini |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 40 | 55 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 60 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 44 |
| Overall | 100% | 42/100 | 54/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiMo-V2-ProXiaomi | GPT-5.1 Codex miniOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.00 | $0.25 (best) |
| Output | $3.00 | $2.00 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.50 | $0.688 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 16 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 400,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 2 | 16 (best) |
| Released | Mar 18, 2026 | Nov 13, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2024 | Sep 30, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiMo-V2-Pro$16.00
- GPT-5.1 Codex mini$6.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiMo-V2-Pro or GPT-5.1 Codex mini?
GPT-5.1 Codex mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against MiMo-V2-Pro (42). It leads on price and inputs & features. MiMo-V2-Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or GPT-5.1 Codex mini?
GPT-5.1 Codex mini is cheaper at $0.25 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (median across 16 API providers). MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1.00 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.688 per million tokens for GPT-5.1 Codex mini versus $1.50 for MiMo-V2-Pro (2.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. MiMo-V2-Pro has not been scored yet and GPT-5.1 Codex mini has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2-Pro and GPT-5.1 Codex mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5.1 Codex mini. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2-Pro up to 131,072, GPT-5.1 Codex mini up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiMo-V2-Pro accepts text; GPT-5.1 Codex mini accepts text and images. GPT-5.1 Codex mini handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. MiMo-V2-Pro and GPT-5.1 Codex mini are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the newest, released Mar 18, 2026. GPT-5.1 Codex mini came out Nov 13, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2-Pro Dec 2024, GPT-5.1 Codex mini Sep 30, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Three-way comparison
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)xAI
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs GLM-5-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs Relace SearchRelace
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogle
- GPT-5.1 Codex mini vs Mistral Large 3Mistral AI
- GPT-5.1 Codex mini vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
