Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct vs Claude Haiku 3.5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite comes out ahead, 82 to 64 and 44 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
MetaLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct
64/100- ECI—
- Price$0.055 / $0.345
- Context128K
AnthropicClaude Haiku 3.5
44/100- ECI127.0
- Price$0.80 / $4.00
- Context200K
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
82/100- ECI—
- Price$0.064 / $0.255
- Context1.05M
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is our pick
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 82/100 against Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct (64) and Claude Haiku 3.5 (44). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite $0.111 · Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct $0.128 · Claude Haiku 3.5 $1.60 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 1,048,576 · Claude Haiku 3.5 200,000 · Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct: Text, Images · Claude Haiku 3.5: Text, Images, PDFs · Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct | Claude Haiku 3.5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 88 | 38 | 91 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 50 | 60 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 32 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 64/100 | 44/100 | 82/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructMeta | Claude Haiku 3.5Anthropic | Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGoogle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 127.0 | — |
| ECI rank | — | #147 of 165 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 38.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 4.3% | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.055 (best) | $0.80 | $0.064 |
| Output | $0.345 | $4.00 | $0.255 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.128 | $1.60 | $0.111 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Median of 3 providers | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 200,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | 8,192 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — | — |
| API providers | 4 (best) | 4 (best) | 3 |
| Released | Sep 25, 2024 | Oct 22, 2024 | Dec 11, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2023 | Jul 31, 2024 | Jun 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct$1.24
- Claude Haiku 3.5$16.00
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite$1.15
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct, Claude Haiku 3.5 or Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 82/100 against Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct (64) and Claude Haiku 3.5 (44). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct, Claude Haiku 3.5 or Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.064 input / $0.255 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct costs $0.055 input / $0.345 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers); Claude Haiku 3.5 costs $0.80 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.111 per million tokens for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite versus $0.128 for Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct (1.1× as much) and $1.60 for Claude Haiku 3.5 (14× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct has not been scored yet, Claude Haiku 3.5 has an ECI of 127.0 and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct, Claude Haiku 3.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 200,000 for Claude Haiku 3.5 and 128,000 for Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct up to 4,096, Claude Haiku 3.5 up to 8,192, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct accepts text and images; Claude Haiku 3.5 accepts text, images and PDFs; Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Claude Haiku 3.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the newest, released Dec 11, 2024. Claude Haiku 3.5 came out Oct 22, 2024; Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct came out Sep 25, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct Dec 2023, Claude Haiku 3.5 Jul 31, 2024, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Jun 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct vs Nova LiteAmazon
- Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct vs Qwen-VL OCRAlibaba (Qwen)
- Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct vs solar-miniUpstage
- Claude Haiku 3.5 vs Mistral Large 2.1Mistral AI · ECI 128.6
- Claude Haiku 3.5 vs Llama-3.3-70B-InstructMeta · ECI 127.3
- Claude Haiku 3.5 vs GPT-4oOpenAI · ECI 129.0
