ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite comes out ahead, 82 to 64 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Meta

    Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct

    Released Sep 25, 2024

    64/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.055 / $0.345
    • Context128K
    Full specs Remove Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct
  2. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

    Released Dec 11, 2024

    82/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.064 / $0.255
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is our pick

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 82/100 against Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct (64). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite $0.111 · Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct $0.128 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 1,048,576 · Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct: Text, Images · Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Price50%8891
Inputs & features30%5080
Context window20%2461
Overall100%64/10082/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite specifications side by side
SpecificationLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructMetaGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.055 (best)$0.064
Output$0.345$0.255 (best)
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.128$0.111 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 3 providersMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output4,096 tokens8,192 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoYes
AudioNoYes
VideoNoYes
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model ID——
API providers4 (best)3
ReleasedSep 25, 2024Dec 11, 2024
Knowledge cutoffDec 2023Jun 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct$1.24
  • Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite$1.15
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct or Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 82/100 against Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct (64). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct or Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.064 input / $0.255 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct costs $0.055 input / $0.345 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.111 per million tokens for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite versus $0.128 for Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct (1.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct has not been scored yet and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 128,000 for Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct up to 4,096, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct accepts text and images; Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the newest, released Dec 11, 2024. Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct came out Sep 25, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct Dec 2023, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Jun 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons