ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Saba vs Solar Pro 2

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct comes out ahead, 62 to 51 and 46 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Meta

    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

    Released Jul 23, 2024

    62/100
    • ECI116.4
    • Price$0.06 / $0.08
    • Context128K
  2. Mistral AI

    Saba

    Released Feb 17, 2025

    46/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $0.60
    • Context33K
  3. Upstage

    Solar Pro 2

    Released May 20, 2025

    51/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.25 / $0.25
    • Context66K
01 — Verdict

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct is our pick

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Solar Pro 2 (51) and Saba (46). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceLlama-3.1-8B-InstructLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct $0.065 · Solar Pro 2 $0.25 · Saba $0.30 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLlama-3.1-8B-InstructLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct 128,000 · Solar Pro 2 65,536 · Saba 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsSabaLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct: Text · Saba: Text, PDFs · Solar Pro 2: Text
  • Self-hostingLlama-3.1-8B-InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLlama-3.1-8B-InstructSabaSolar Pro 2
Price50%1007275
Inputs & features30%253535
Context window20%24012
Overall100%62/10046/10051/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct vs Saba vs Solar Pro 2 specifications side by side
SpecificationLlama-3.1-8B-InstructMetaSabaMistral AISolar Pro 2Upstage
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)116.4——
ECI rank#162 of 165——
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions27.0%——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics1.7%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.06 (best)$0.20$0.25
Output$0.08 (best)$0.60$0.25
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.065 (best)$0.30$0.25
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 17 providersMedian of 4 providersOfficial Upstage API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens (best)32,768 tokens65,536 tokens
Max output4,096 tokens26,214 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoYesNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoYesminimal · high
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryProprietary
API model ID——solar-pro2
API providers18 (best)42
ReleasedJul 23, 2024Feb 17, 2025May 20, 2025
Knowledge cutoffDec 2023Sep 30, 2024Mar 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct$0.76
  • Saba$3.20
  • Solar Pro 2$3.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Saba or Solar Pro 2?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Solar Pro 2 (51) and Saba (46). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Saba or Solar Pro 2?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct is cheaper at $0.06 input / $0.08 output per million tokens (median across 17 API providers). Solar Pro 2 costs $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price); Saba costs $0.20 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.065 per million tokens for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct versus $0.25 for Solar Pro 2 (3.8× as much) and $0.30 for Saba (4.6× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct has an ECI of 116.4, Saba has not been scored yet and Solar Pro 2 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Saba and Solar Pro 2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct has the largest context window at 128,000 tokens, against 65,536 for Solar Pro 2 and 32,768 for Saba. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct up to 4,096, Saba up to 26,214, Solar Pro 2 up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct accepts text; Saba accepts text and PDFs; Solar Pro 2 accepts text. Saba handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Saba and Solar Pro 2 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Solar Pro 2 is the newest, released May 20, 2025. Saba came out Feb 17, 2025; Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct came out Jul 23, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct Dec 2023, Saba Sep 30, 2024, Solar Pro 2 Mar 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.