Kling v2.6 vs Veo 3.1 Fast
Preferred for text to video: Veo 3.1 Fast · Preferred for image to video: Veo 3.1 Fast · Newest: Kling v2.6. Quality scores are blind human-preference votes; specs and prices come from each lab’s listings.
Kling AI
Kling v2.6
- Arena1,294
- From—
- Max length—
Google
Veo 3.1 Fast
- Arena1,385
- From$0.08/s
- Max length8 s
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Where they differ
Quality is the arena score from blind, side-by-side human votes. Price, length and resolution come from each lab’s own listings.
- Preferred for text to videoVeo 3.1 FastKling v2.6 1,216 (#29) · Veo 3.1 Fast 1,362 (#14) — blind human votes
- Preferred for image to videoVeo 3.1 FastKling v2.6 1,294 (#26) · Veo 3.1 Fast 1,385 (#15) — blind human votes
- NewestKling v2.6Kling v2.6 Dec 3, 2025 · Veo 3.1 Fast Oct 15, 2025
- Widest inputsVeo 3.1 FastKling v2.6: Text prompts, Reference images · Veo 3.1 Fast: Text prompts, Reference images, Video
- Native audioVeo 3.1 FastGenerates an audio track with the video: Kling v2.6 no · Veo 3.1 Fast yes
- Image to videoBoth animate imagesStarts from an uploaded image: Kling v2.6 yes · Veo 3.1 Fast yes
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs and apps
- Most API hostsVeo 3.1 FastKling v2.6: 1 · Veo 3.1 Fast: 3
Every spec in one table
Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Quality (blind human votes) | ||
| Text to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | 1,216 ±7#29 of 48 · 73,362 votes | 1,362 ±10#14 of 48 · 39,484 votes (best) |
| Image to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | 1,294 ±8#26 of 48 · 202,113 votes | 1,385 ±9#15 of 48 · 99,804 votes (best) |
| Price | ||
| Starting price | — | $0.08/s 720p |
| Top price | — | $0.30/s 4K, with audio |
| 10-second clip | — | $0.80at the starting rate |
| How it is billed | — | Per second |
| Output | ||
| Produces | Video | Video with sound |
| Resolutions | — | 720p · 1080p · 4K |
| Highest resolution | — | 4K |
| Clip length | — | 4, 6 or 8 s |
| Longest clip | — | 8 s |
| Sound | — | Optional |
| Frame control | — | First and last frame |
| Aspect ratios | — | 16:9 · 9:16 |
| Inputs | ||
| Text prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Start image (image to video) | Yes | Yes |
| Video input | No | Yes |
| Audio input | No | No |
| Access | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API hosts | 1 | 3 (best) |
| Released | Dec 3, 2025 | Oct 15, 2025 |
Which should you choose?
Which is better, Kling v2.6 or Veo 3.1 Fast?
For text to video, voters prefer Veo 3.1 Fast (Kling v2.6 1,216 (#29) · Veo 3.1 Fast 1,362 (#14)). For image to video, voters prefer Veo 3.1 Fast (Kling v2.6 1,294 (#26) · Veo 3.1 Fast 1,385 (#15)). Arena scores come from blind, side-by-side human votes on the same prompts; when the gap is inside both models’ error margins we call it a tie. Test your own prompts before you commit.
Which is cheaper?
Veo 3.1 Fast costs from $0.08/s (720p), up to $0.30/s (4K, with audio). A 10-second clip at the lowest rate: Veo 3.1 Fast $0.80. Kling v2.6 has no published per-second price. Prices are list rates and change often; check the lab before budgeting.
How long can the videos be, and at what resolution?
Kling v2.6: length not published; Veo 3.1 Fast: 4, 6 or 8 s, 720p / 1080p / 4K.
What is the difference between Kling v2.6 and Veo 3.1 Fast?
Kling v2.6 is a video model from Kling AI (Dec 3, 2025), taking text prompts and reference images and producing video. Veo 3.1 Fast is a video model from Google (Oct 15, 2025), taking text prompts, reference images and video and producing video with sound.
Which is newer?
Kling v2.6 Dec 3, 2025; Veo 3.1 Fast Oct 15, 2025.
Which generates video with sound?
Generates an audio track with the video: Kling v2.6 no; Veo 3.1 Fast yes.
Can I run any of these on my own hardware?
No open weights. Both are available only through APIs and apps.