Kling v2.6 vs Wan v2.6
Preferred for text to video: Wan v2.6 · Preferred for image to video: Wan v2.6 · Newest: Wan v2.6. Quality scores are blind human-preference votes; specs and prices come from each lab’s listings.
Kling AIKling v2.6
- Arena1,294
- From—
- Max length—
Alibaba (Qwen)Wan v2.6
- Arena1,327
- From$0.10/s
- Max length10 s
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Where they differ
Quality is the arena score from blind, side-by-side human votes. Price, length and resolution come from each lab’s own listings.
- Preferred for text to videoWan v2.6Kling v2.6 1,216 (#29) · Wan v2.6 1,327 (#21) — blind human votes
- Preferred for image to videoWan v2.6Kling v2.6 1,294 (#26) · Wan v2.6 1,310 (#23) — blind human votes
- NewestWan v2.6Kling v2.6 Dec 3, 2025 · Wan v2.6 Dec 16, 2025
- Widest inputsWan v2.6Kling v2.6: Text prompts, Reference images · Wan v2.6: Text prompts, Reference images, Audio, Video
- Native audioWan v2.6Generates an audio track with the video: Kling v2.6 no · Wan v2.6 yes
- Image to videoBoth animate imagesStarts from an uploaded image: Kling v2.6 yes · Wan v2.6 yes
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs and apps
- Most API hostsSame reachKling v2.6: 1 · Wan v2.6: 1
Every spec in one table
Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Kling v2.6Kling AI | Wan v2.6Alibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Quality (blind human votes) | ||
| Text to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | 1,216 ±7#29 of 48 · 73,362 votes | 1,327 ±7#21 of 48 · 54,050 votes (best) |
| Image to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | 1,294 ±8#26 of 48 · 202,113 votes | 1,310 ±7#23 of 48 · 121,082 votes (best) |
| Price | ||
| Starting price | — | $0.10/s 720p |
| Top price | — | $0.15/s 1080p |
| 10-second clip | — | $1.00at the starting rate |
| How it is billed | — | Per second |
| Output | ||
| Produces | Video | Video with sound |
| Resolutions | — | 720p · 1080p |
| Highest resolution | — | 1080p |
| Clip length | — | 5–10 s |
| Longest clip | — | 10 s |
| Sound | — | Optional |
| Frame control | — | First frame only |
| Inputs | ||
| Text prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Start image (image to video) | Yes | Yes |
| Video input | No | Yes |
| Audio input | No | Yes |
| References | — | Video and audio |
| Access | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API hosts | 1 | 1 |
| Released | Dec 3, 2025 | Dec 16, 2025 |
Which should you choose?
Which is better, Kling v2.6 or Wan v2.6?
For text to video, voters prefer Wan v2.6 (Kling v2.6 1,216 (#29) · Wan v2.6 1,327 (#21)). For image to video, voters prefer Wan v2.6 (Kling v2.6 1,294 (#26) · Wan v2.6 1,310 (#23)). Arena scores come from blind, side-by-side human votes on the same prompts; when the gap is inside both models’ error margins we call it a tie. Test your own prompts before you commit.
Which is cheaper?
Wan v2.6 costs from $0.10/s (720p), up to $0.15/s (1080p). A 10-second clip at the lowest rate: Wan v2.6 $1.00. Kling v2.6 has no published per-second price. Prices are list rates and change often; check the lab before budgeting.
How long can the videos be, and at what resolution?
Kling v2.6: length not published; Wan v2.6: 5–10 s, 720p / 1080p.
What is the difference between Kling v2.6 and Wan v2.6?
Kling v2.6 is a video model from Kling AI (Dec 3, 2025), taking text prompts and reference images and producing video. Wan v2.6 is a video model from Alibaba (Qwen) (Dec 16, 2025), taking text prompts, reference images, audio and video and producing video with sound.
Which is newer?
Kling v2.6 Dec 3, 2025; Wan v2.6 Dec 16, 2025.
Which generates video with sound?
Generates an audio track with the video: Kling v2.6 no; Wan v2.6 yes.
Can I run any of these on my own hardware?
No open weights. Both are available only through APIs and apps.
