ZMIME
Video model comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Kling v2.5 Turbo vs Wan 2.2 A14B

Preferred for text to video: Kling v2.5 Turbo · Preferred for image to video: Kling v2.5 Turbo · Newest: Kling v2.5 Turbo. Quality scores are blind human-preference votes; specs and prices come from each lab’s listings.

  1. Kling AI

    Kling v2.5 Turbo

    Released Sep 23, 2025

    • Text to video
    • Image to video
    • Arena1,276
    • From—
    • Max length—
    Full specs Remove Kling v2.5 Turbo

  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Wan 2.2 A14B

    Released Jul 28, 2025

    • Text to video
    • Arena1,170
    • From—
    • Max length—
    Full specs Remove Wan 2.2 A14B

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — At a glance

Where they differ

Quality is the arena score from blind, side-by-side human votes. Price, length and resolution come from each lab’s own listings.

  • Preferred for text to videoKling v2.5 TurboKling v2.5 Turbo 1,220 (#28) · Wan 2.2 A14B 1,132 (#42) — blind human votes
  • Preferred for image to videoKling v2.5 TurboKling v2.5 Turbo 1,276 (#27) · Wan 2.2 A14B 1,170 (#43) — blind human votes
  • NewestKling v2.5 TurboKling v2.5 Turbo Sep 23, 2025 · Wan 2.2 A14B Jul 28, 2025
  • Widest inputsKling v2.5 TurboKling v2.5 Turbo: Text prompts, Reference images · Wan 2.2 A14B: Text prompts
  • Native audioNo native audioGenerates an audio track with the video: Kling v2.5 Turbo no · Wan 2.2 A14B no
  • Image to videoKling v2.5 TurboStarts from an uploaded image: Kling v2.5 Turbo yes · Wan 2.2 A14B no
  • Self-hostingWan 2.2 A14BDownloadable weights
  • Most API hostsSame reachKling v2.5 Turbo: 1 · Wan 2.2 A14B: 1
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Dashes mean the data is not published.

Kling v2.5 Turbo vs Wan 2.2 A14B specifications side by side
SpecificationKling v2.5 TurboKling AIWan 2.2 A14BAlibaba (Qwen)
Quality (blind human votes)
Text to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better1,220 ±17#28 of 48 · 2,111 votes (best)1,132 ±15#42 of 48 · 10,458 votes
Image to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better1,276 ±13#27 of 48 · 3,795 votes (best)1,170 ±10#43 of 48 · 27,054 votes
Output
ProducesVideoVideo
Inputs
Text promptsYesYes
Start image (image to video)YesNo
Video inputNoNo
Audio inputNoNo
Access
WeightsProprietaryOpen
API hosts11
ReleasedSep 23, 2025Jul 28, 2025
03 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better, Kling v2.5 Turbo or Wan 2.2 A14B?

For text to video, voters prefer Kling v2.5 Turbo (Kling v2.5 Turbo 1,220 (#28) · Wan 2.2 A14B 1,132 (#42)). For image to video, voters prefer Kling v2.5 Turbo (Kling v2.5 Turbo 1,276 (#27) · Wan 2.2 A14B 1,170 (#43)). Arena scores come from blind, side-by-side human votes on the same prompts; when the gap is inside both models’ error margins we call it a tie. Test your own prompts before you commit.

What is the difference between Kling v2.5 Turbo and Wan 2.2 A14B?

Kling v2.5 Turbo is a video model from Kling AI (Sep 23, 2025), taking text prompts and reference images and producing video. Wan 2.2 A14B is a video model from Alibaba (Qwen) (Jul 28, 2025), taking text prompts and producing video.

Which is newer?

Kling v2.5 Turbo Sep 23, 2025; Wan 2.2 A14B Jul 28, 2025.

Which generates video with sound?

Generates an audio track with the video: Kling v2.5 Turbo no; Wan 2.2 A14B no.

Can I run any of these on my own hardware?

Wan 2.2 A14B. Downloadable weights.

04 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons