ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 vs GLM-4.5 vs Apertus 70B

Too close to call on our weighted score (GLM-4.5 39, Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 38, Apertus 70B 32). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K2 Instruct 0905

    Released Sep 5, 2025

    38/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.60 / $2.50
    • Context262K
  2. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-4.5

    Released Jul 28, 2025

    39/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.60 / $2.20
    • Context131K
  3. Swiss AI

    Apertus 70B

    Released Sep 2, 2025

    32/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.82 / $2.42
    • Context66K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (GLM-4.5 39/100, Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 38/100, Apertus 70B 32/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GLM-4.5 on price and Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGLM-4.5GLM-4.5 $1.00 · Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 $1.07 · Apertus 70B $1.22 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextKimi K2 Instruct 0905Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 262,144 · GLM-4.5 131,072 · Apertus 70B 65,536 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsKimi K2 Instruct 0905: Text · GLM-4.5: Text · Apertus 70B: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightKimi K2 Instruct 0905GLM-4.5Apertus 70B
Price50%464844
Inputs & features30%253525
Context window20%372512
Overall100%38/10039/10032/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 vs GLM-4.5 vs Apertus 70B specifications side by side
SpecificationKimi K2 Instruct 0905Moonshot AIGLM-4.5Z.ai (Zhipu)Apertus 70BSwiss AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.60 (best)$0.60 (best)$0.82
Output$2.50$2.20 (best)$2.42
Cached input—$0.11—
Blended (3:1)$1.07$1.00 (best)$1.22
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 12 providersOfficial Z.AI APIMedian of 3 providers
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens (best)131,072 tokens65,536 tokens
Max output98,304 tokens (best)98,304 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenModified MITOpenOpenApache-2.0
API model ID—glm-4.5—
API providers1319 (best)3
ReleasedSep 5, 2025Jul 28, 2025Sep 2, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Apr 2025Sep 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Kimi K2 Instruct 0905$11.00
  • GLM-4.5$10.40
  • Apertus 70B$13.04
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Kimi K2 Instruct 0905, GLM-4.5 or Apertus 70B?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (GLM-4.5 39/100, Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 38/100, Apertus 70B 32/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GLM-4.5 on price and Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 Instruct 0905, GLM-4.5 or Apertus 70B?

GLM-4.5 is cheaper at $0.60 input / $2.20 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 costs $0.60 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (median across 12 API providers); Apertus 70B costs $0.82 input / $2.42 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.00 per million tokens for GLM-4.5 versus $1.07 for Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 (1.1× as much) and $1.22 for Apertus 70B (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 has not been scored yet, GLM-4.5 has not been scored yet and Apertus 70B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Kimi K2 Instruct 0905, GLM-4.5 and Apertus 70B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for GLM-4.5 and 65,536 for Apertus 70B. Maximum output per response: Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 up to 98,304, GLM-4.5 up to 98,304, Apertus 70B up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 accepts text; GLM-4.5 accepts text; Apertus 70B accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Modified MIT and Apache-2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 is the newest, released Sep 5, 2025. Apertus 70B came out Sep 2, 2025; GLM-4.5 came out Jul 28, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GLM-4.5 Apr 2025, Apertus 70B Sep 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.