ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs Inkling vs Kimi K2.6

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) comes out ahead, 67 to 64 and 63 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    xAI

    Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)

    Released Mar 9, 2026

    67/100
    • ECI152.3
    • Price$1.25 / $2.50
    • Context1M
  2. Thinking Machines

    Inkling

    Released Jul 15, 2026

    63/100
    • ECI148.5
    • Price$1.00 / $4.05
    • Context1.05M
  3. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K2.6

    Released Apr 20, 2026

    64/100
    • ECI151.1
    • Price$0.95 / $4.00
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is our pick

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against Kimi K2.6 (64) and Inkling (63). It leads on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 152.3 · Kimi K2.6 151.1 · Inkling 148.5
  • Lowest priceGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) $1.56 · Kimi K2.6 $1.71 · Inkling $1.76 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextInklingInkling 1,048,576 · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 1,000,000 · Kimi K2.6 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsGrok 4.20 (Reasoning): Text, Images, PDFs · Inkling: Text, Images, Audio · Kimi K2.6: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingInkling and Kimi K2.6Publishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)InklingKimi K2.6
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%797578
Price25%393737
Inputs & features15%807080
Context window10%606137
Overall100%67/10063/10064/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs Inkling vs Kimi K2.6 specifications side by side
SpecificationGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)xAIInklingThinking MachinesKimi K2.6Moonshot AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)152.3 (best)148.5151.1
ECI rank#51 of 165 (best)#67 of 165#55 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions89.3%88.3%90.8% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics44.9%33.3%57.2% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics92.2%88.9%96.1% (best)
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues——76.7%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions30.2%40.3% (best)34.9%
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25$1.00$0.95 (best)
Output$2.50 (best)$4.05$4.00
Cached input$0.20$0.17$0.16 (best)
Blended (3:1)$1.56 (best)$1.76$1.71
Long-context rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $5.00Same rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial xAI APIOfficial Thinking Machines APIOfficial Moonshot AI API
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)262,144 tokens
Max output30,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)262,144 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningYesYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenApache-2.0Open
API model IDgrok-4.20-0309-reasoningthinkingmachines/Inkling:peft:262144:sampling-nvfp4kimi-k2.6
API providers152060 (best)
ReleasedMar 9, 2026Jul 15, 2026Apr 20, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——Jan 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)$17.50
  • Inkling$18.10
  • Kimi K2.6$17.50
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning), Inkling or Kimi K2.6?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against Kimi K2.6 (64) and Inkling (63). It leads on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning), Inkling or Kimi K2.6?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is cheaper at $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Moonshot AI API price); Inkling costs $1.00 input / $4.05 output per million tokens (official Thinking Machines API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.56 per million tokens for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) versus $1.71 for Kimi K2.6 (1.1× as much) and $1.76 for Inkling (1.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 152.3 (#51 of 165), Kimi K2.6 151.1 (#55 of 165) and Inkling 148.5 (#67 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (149.5–154.7 vs 149.1–152.9), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Kimi K2.6 90.8%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 89.3%, Inkling 88.3%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Kimi K2.6 57.2%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 44.9%, Inkling 33.3%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Kimi K2.6 96.1%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 92.2%, Inkling 88.9%; SimpleQA Verified — Inkling 40.3%, Kimi K2.6 34.9%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 30.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) and Inkling yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) and 262,144 for Kimi K2.6. Maximum output per response: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) up to 30,000, Inkling up to 1,048,576, Kimi K2.6 up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) accepts text, images and PDFs; Inkling accepts text, images and audio; Kimi K2.6 accepts text, images and video. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Inkling and Kimi K2.6 publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Inkling is the newest, released Jul 15, 2026. Kimi K2.6 came out Apr 20, 2026; Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) came out Mar 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Kimi K2.6 Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.