ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs Relace Search vs MiMo-V2-Pro

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) comes out ahead, 52 to 42 and 35 on our weighted score.

  1. Our pick

    xAI

    Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)

    Released Mar 9, 2026

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.25 / $2.50
    • Context1M
  2. Relace

    Relace Search

    Released Dec 8, 2025

    35/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $3.00
    • Context256K
  3. Xiaomi

    MiMo-V2-Pro

    Released Mar 18, 2026

    42/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $3.00
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is our pick

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against MiMo-V2-Pro (42) and Relace Search (35). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceRelace Search and MiMo-V2-ProRelace Search $1.50 · MiMo-V2-Pro $1.50 · Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) $1.56 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMiMo-V2-ProMiMo-V2-Pro 1,048,576 · Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) 1,000,000 · Relace Search 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): Text, Images, PDFs · Relace Search: Text · MiMo-V2-Pro: Text
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Relace SearchMiMo-V2-Pro
Price50%394040
Inputs & features30%702535
Context window20%603661
Overall100%52/10035/10042/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs Relace Search vs MiMo-V2-Pro specifications side by side
SpecificationGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)xAIRelace SearchRelaceMiMo-V2-ProXiaomi
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25$1.00 (best)$1.00 (best)
Output$2.50 (best)$3.00$3.00
Cached input$0.20——
Blended (3:1)$1.56$1.50 (best)$1.50 (best)
Long-context rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $5.00Same rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial xAI APIMedian of 3 providersMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens256,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output30,000 tokens128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgrok-4.20-0309-non-reasoning——
API providers13 (best)32
ReleasedMar 9, 2026Dec 8, 2025Mar 18, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——Dec 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)$17.50
  • Relace Search$16.00
  • MiMo-V2-Pro$16.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning), Relace Search or MiMo-V2-Pro?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against MiMo-V2-Pro (42) and Relace Search (35). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning), Relace Search or MiMo-V2-Pro?

Relace Search is cheaper at $1.00 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1.00 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) costs $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.50 per million tokens for Relace Search versus $1.50 for MiMo-V2-Pro (1× as much) and $1.56 for Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) (1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has not been scored yet, Relace Search has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2-Pro has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning), Relace Search and MiMo-V2-Pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) and 256,000 for Relace Search. Maximum output per response: Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) up to 30,000, Relace Search up to 128,000, MiMo-V2-Pro up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) accepts text, images and PDFs; Relace Search accepts text; MiMo-V2-Pro accepts text. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning), Relace Search and MiMo-V2-Pro are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the newest, released Mar 18, 2026. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) came out Mar 9, 2026; Relace Search came out Dec 8, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2-Pro Dec 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.