ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

GPT-5.6 Sol vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash comes out ahead, 70 to 59 and 39 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.6 Sol

    Released Jul 9, 2026

    39/100
    • ECI162.6
    • Price$4.00 / $20.00
    • Context1.05M
  2. Our pick

    MiniMax

    MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

    Released Oct 19, 2026New

    70/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.60
    • Context1M
  3. NVIDIA

    Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B

    Released Oct 15, 2026New

    59/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $0.50
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is our pick

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 70/100 against Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B (59) and GPT-5.6 Sol (39). GPT-5.6 Sol wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMax-M3.1-Flash $0.263 · Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B $0.275 · GPT-5.6 Sol $8.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-5.6 Sol and Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BGPT-5.6 Sol 1,050,000 · Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B 1,048,576 · MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-5.6 Sol and MiniMax-M3.1-FlashGPT-5.6 Sol: Text, Images, PDFs · MiniMax-M3.1-Flash: Text, Images, Video · Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B: Text
  • Self-hostingNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.6 SolMiniMax-M3.1-FlashNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B
Price50%77473
Inputs & features30%807035
Context window20%616061
Overall100%39/10070/10059/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIMiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BNVIDIA
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)162.6——
ECI rank#12 of 165——
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions93.5%——
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics89.1%——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics100%——
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions69.7%——
Price per million tokens
Input$4.00$0.15 (best)$0.20
Output$20.00$0.60$0.50 (best)
Cached input$0.40$0.015 (best)—
Blended (3:1)$8.00$0.263 (best)$0.275
Long-context rateOver 272K: $8.00 / $30.00Same rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial MiniMax (minimax.io) APIMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window1,050,000 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens512,000 tokens (best)131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpen
API model IDgpt-5.6-solMiniMax-M3.1-Flash—
API providers49 (best)251
ReleasedJul 9, 2026Oct 19, 2026Oct 15, 2026
Knowledge cutoffFeb 16, 2026——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.6 Sol$80.00
  • MiniMax-M3.1-Flash$2.70
  • Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B$3.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.6 Sol, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B?

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 70/100 against Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B (59) and GPT-5.6 Sol (39). GPT-5.6 Sol wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Sol, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B?

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B costs $0.20 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); GPT-5.6 Sol costs $4.00 input / $20.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for MiniMax-M3.1-Flash versus $0.275 for Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B (1× as much) and $8.00 for GPT-5.6 Sol (30× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GPT-5.6 Sol has an ECI of 162.6, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash has not been scored yet and Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.6 Sol, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.6 Sol and Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B have the largest context windows (1,050,000 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 1,000,000 for MiniMax-M3.1-Flash. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.6 Sol up to 128,000, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash up to 512,000, Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.6 Sol accepts text, images and PDFs; MiniMax-M3.1-Flash accepts text, images and video; Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B accepts text. GPT-5.6 Sol handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.6 Sol and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is proprietary.

Which is newer?

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is the newest, released Oct 19, 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B came out Oct 15, 2026; GPT-5.6 Sol came out Jul 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.6 Sol Feb 16, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.