GPT-5.6 Cyber vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Seed 2.1 Pro
Seed 2.1 Pro comes out ahead, 50 to 43 and 30 on our weighted score, though MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed is 8% cheaper per token.
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Cyber
30/100- ECI—
- Price$12.50 / $75.00
- Context400K
XiaomiMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed
43/100- ECI—
- Price$1.30 / $2.61
- Context1.05M
- Our pick
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.1 Pro
50/100- ECI—
- Price$0.891 / $4.45
- Context256K
Seed 2.1 Pro is our pick
Seed 2.1 Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed (43) and GPT-5.6 Cyber (30). It leads on inputs & features. MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed wins on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed $1.63 · Seed 2.1 Pro $1.78 · GPT-5.6 Cyber $28.13 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed 1,048,576 · GPT-5.6 Cyber 400,000 · Seed 2.1 Pro 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.1 ProGPT-5.6 Cyber: Text, Images · MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed: Text · Seed 2.1 Pro: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GPT-5.6 Cyber | MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed | Seed 2.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 0 | 40 | 38 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 35 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 44 | 61 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 30/100 | 43/100 | 50/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GPT-5.6 CyberOpenAI | MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedXiaomi | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $12.50 | $1.30 | $0.891 (best) |
| Output | $75.00 | $2.61 (best) | $4.45 |
| Cached input | $1.25 | $0.011 (best) | $0.178 |
| Blended (3:1) | $28.13 | $1.63 (best) | $1.78 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Official Xiaomi API | Official Volcengine Ark API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 400,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gpt-daybreak-red-latest | mimo-v2.5-pro-ultraspeed | doubao-seed-2-1-pro-260628 |
| API providers | 1 | 1 | 2 (best) |
| Released | Aug 7, 2026 | Jun 8, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Feb 16, 2026 | Dec 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GPT-5.6 Cyber$275.00
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed$18.27
- Seed 2.1 Pro$17.81
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-5.6 Cyber, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed or Seed 2.1 Pro?
Seed 2.1 Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed (43) and GPT-5.6 Cyber (30). It leads on inputs & features. MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed wins on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Cyber, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed or Seed 2.1 Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed is cheaper at $1.30 input / $2.61 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). Seed 2.1 Pro costs $0.891 input / $4.45 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price); GPT-5.6 Cyber costs $12.50 input / $75.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.63 per million tokens for MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed versus $1.78 for Seed 2.1 Pro (1.1× as much) and $28.13 for GPT-5.6 Cyber (17× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GPT-5.6 Cyber has not been scored yet, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed has not been scored yet and Seed 2.1 Pro has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.6 Cyber, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed and Seed 2.1 Pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5.6 Cyber and 256,000 for Seed 2.1 Pro. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.6 Cyber up to 128,000, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed up to 131,072, Seed 2.1 Pro up to 256,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-5.6 Cyber accepts text and images; MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed accepts text; Seed 2.1 Pro accepts text, images and video. Seed 2.1 Pro handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.6 Cyber and Seed 2.1 Pro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
GPT-5.6 Cyber is the newest, released Aug 7, 2026. Seed 2.1 Pro came out Jun 23, 2026; MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed came out Jun 8, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.6 Cyber Feb 16, 2026, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed Dec 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
