MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Too close to call on our weighted score (DeepSeek V4 Pro 45, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed 43). The right pick depends on what you value most.
XiaomiMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed
43/100- ECI—
- Price$1.30 / $2.61
- Context1.05M
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro
45/100- ECI—
- Price$1.32 / $3.00
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (DeepSeek V4 Pro 45/100, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed 43/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed on price and MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed $1.63 · DeepSeek V4 Pro $1.74 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed 1,048,576 · DeepSeek V4 Pro 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsMiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed: Text · DeepSeek V4 Pro: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 40 | 38 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 45 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 43/100 | 45/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedXiaomi | DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.30 (best) | $1.32 |
| Output | $2.61 (best) | $3.00 |
| Cached input | $0.011 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.63 (best) | $1.74 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Xiaomi API | Median of 49 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 384,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | mimo-v2.5-pro-ultraspeed | — |
| API providers | 1 | 52 (best) |
| Released | Jun 8, 2026 | Apr 24, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2024 | May 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed$18.27
- DeepSeek V4 Pro$19.20
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (DeepSeek V4 Pro 45/100, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed 43/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed on price and MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed is cheaper at $1.30 input / $2.61 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.32 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 49 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.63 per million tokens for MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed versus $1.74 for DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed has not been scored yet and DeepSeek V4 Pro has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed and DeepSeek V4 Pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for DeepSeek V4 Pro. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed up to 131,072, DeepSeek V4 Pro up to 384,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed accepts text; DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed is the newest, released Jun 8, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro came out Apr 24, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed Dec 2024, DeepSeek V4 Pro May 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Seed 2.1 ProThree-way comparison
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Sakana NamazuSakana AI
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed vs LongCat-2.0Meituan (LongCat)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM-5V-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogle
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed
