ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

GPT-5.3 Chat vs Qwen3.5 9B Base

Qwen3.5 9B Base comes out ahead, 50 to 28 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.3 Chat

    Released Mar 3, 2026

    28/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.75 / $14.00
    • Context128K
  2. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.5 9B Base

    Released Feb 26, 2026

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.30 / $0.807
    • Context262K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Qwen3.5 9B Base is our pick

Qwen3.5 9B Base is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against GPT-5.3 Chat (28). It leads on price and context window. GPT-5.3 Chat wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3.5 9B BaseQwen3.5 9B Base $0.427 · GPT-5.3 Chat $4.81 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3.5 9B BaseQwen3.5 9B Base 262,144 · GPT-5.3 Chat 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.5 9B BaseGPT-5.3 Chat: Text, Images · Qwen3.5 9B Base: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingQwen3.5 9B BasePublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.3 ChatQwen3.5 9B Base
Price50%1765
Inputs & features30%5035
Context window20%2437
Overall100%28/10050/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.3 Chat vs Qwen3.5 9B Base specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.3 ChatOpenAIQwen3.5 9B BaseAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$1.75$0.30 (best)
Output$14.00$0.807 (best)
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$4.81$0.427 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 4 providersMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output16,384 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoYes
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesNo
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenApache-2.0
API model ID——
API providers4 (best)1
ReleasedMar 3, 2026Feb 26, 2026
Knowledge cutoffAug 31, 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.3 Chat$45.50
  • Qwen3.5 9B Base$4.61
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.3 Chat or Qwen3.5 9B Base?

Qwen3.5 9B Base is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against GPT-5.3 Chat (28). It leads on price and context window. GPT-5.3 Chat wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Chat or Qwen3.5 9B Base?

Qwen3.5 9B Base is cheaper at $0.30 input / $0.807 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). GPT-5.3 Chat costs $1.75 input / $14.00 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.427 per million tokens for Qwen3.5 9B Base versus $4.81 for GPT-5.3 Chat (11× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. GPT-5.3 Chat has not been scored yet and Qwen3.5 9B Base has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.3 Chat and Qwen3.5 9B Base yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen3.5 9B Base does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 9B Base has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 128,000 for GPT-5.3 Chat. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.3 Chat up to 16,384, Qwen3.5 9B Base up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.3 Chat accepts text and images; Qwen3.5 9B Base accepts text, images and video. Qwen3.5 9B Base handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3.5 9B Base publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.3 Chat is proprietary.

Which is newer?

GPT-5.3 Chat is the newest, released Mar 3, 2026. Qwen3.5 9B Base came out Feb 26, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.3 Chat Aug 31, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.