GPT-5.3 Chat vs Command A Plus
Command A Plus comes out ahead, 35 to 32 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Chat
32/100- ECI—
- Price$1.75 / $14.00
- Context128K
- Our pick
Cohere
Command A Plus
35/100- ECI—
- Price$2.50 / $10.00
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Command A Plus is our pick
Command A Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 35/100 against GPT-5.3 Chat (32). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceCommand A PlusCommand A Plus $4.38 · GPT-5.3 Chat $4.81 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameGPT-5.3 Chat 128,000 · Command A Plus 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGPT-5.3 Chat: Text, Images · Command A Plus: Text, Images
- Self-hostingCommand A PlusPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GPT-5.3 Chat | Command A Plus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 18 | 19 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 60 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 32/100 | 35/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.75 (best) | $2.50 |
| Output | $14.00 | $10.00 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.175 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.81 | $4.38 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Official Cohere API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens | 64,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | gpt-5.3-chat-latest | command-a-plus-05-2026 |
| API providers | 4 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Mar 3, 2026 | May 20, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 31, 2025 | Apr 1, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
GPT-5.3 Chat$45.50
Command A Plus$45.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-5.3 Chat or Command A Plus?
Command A Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 35/100 against GPT-5.3 Chat (32). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Chat or Command A Plus?
Command A Plus is cheaper at $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). GPT-5.3 Chat costs $1.75 input / $14.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $4.38 per million tokens for Command A Plus versus $4.81 for GPT-5.3 Chat (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. GPT-5.3 Chat has not been scored yet and Command A Plus has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.3 Chat and Command A Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.3 Chat and Command A Plus share the same 128,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.3 Chat up to 16,384, Command A Plus up to 64,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-5.3 Chat accepts text and images; Command A Plus accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Command A Plus publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.3 Chat is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Command A Plus is the newest, released May 20, 2026. GPT-5.3 Chat came out Mar 3, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.3 Chat Aug 31, 2025, Command A Plus Apr 1, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.