ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

GPT-5.1 Codex mini vs Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Mistral Large 3

Too close to call on our weighted score (Seed 2.1 Turbo 56, GPT-5.1 Codex mini 54, Mistral Large 3 52). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.1 Codex mini

    Released Nov 13, 2025

    54/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.25 / $2.00
    • Context400K
  2. ByteDance Seed

    Seed 2.1 Turbo

    Released Jun 23, 2026

    56/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.445 / $2.23
    • Context256K
  3. Mistral AI

    Mistral Large 3

    Released Dec 2, 2025

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Seed 2.1 Turbo 56/100, GPT-5.1 Codex mini 54/100, Mistral Large 3 52/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.1 Codex mini on price and GPT-5.1 Codex mini for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGPT-5.1 Codex miniGPT-5.1 Codex mini $0.688 · Mistral Large 3 $0.75 · Seed 2.1 Turbo $0.891 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-5.1 Codex miniGPT-5.1 Codex mini 400,000 · Mistral Large 3 262,144 · Seed 2.1 Turbo 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSeed 2.1 TurboGPT-5.1 Codex mini: Text, Images · Seed 2.1 Turbo: Text, Images, Video · Mistral Large 3: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingMistral Large 3Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.1 Codex miniSeed 2.1 TurboMistral Large 3
Price50%555053
Inputs & features30%608060
Context window20%443637
Overall100%54/10056/10052/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.1 Codex mini vs Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Mistral Large 3 specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.1 Codex miniOpenAISeed 2.1 TurboByteDance SeedMistral Large 3Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.25 (best)$0.445$0.50
Output$2.00$2.23$1.50 (best)
Cached input—$0.089$0.05 (best)
Blended (3:1)$0.688 (best)$0.891$0.75
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 16 providersOfficial Volcengine Ark APIOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window400,000 tokens (best)256,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens256,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYesYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · maxNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpen
API model ID—doubao-seed-2-1-turbo-260628mistral-large-2512
API providers16817 (best)
ReleasedNov 13, 2025Jun 23, 2026Dec 2, 2025
Knowledge cutoffSep 30, 2024—Nov 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.1 Codex mini$6.50
  • Seed 2.1 Turbo$8.91
  • Mistral Large 3$8.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.1 Codex mini, Seed 2.1 Turbo or Mistral Large 3?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Seed 2.1 Turbo 56/100, GPT-5.1 Codex mini 54/100, Mistral Large 3 52/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.1 Codex mini on price and GPT-5.1 Codex mini for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1 Codex mini, Seed 2.1 Turbo or Mistral Large 3?

GPT-5.1 Codex mini is cheaper at $0.25 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (median across 16 API providers). Mistral Large 3 costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Seed 2.1 Turbo costs $0.445 input / $2.23 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.688 per million tokens for GPT-5.1 Codex mini versus $0.75 for Mistral Large 3 (1.1× as much) and $0.891 for Seed 2.1 Turbo (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GPT-5.1 Codex mini has not been scored yet, Seed 2.1 Turbo has not been scored yet and Mistral Large 3 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.1 Codex mini, Seed 2.1 Turbo and Mistral Large 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.1 Codex mini has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Mistral Large 3 and 256,000 for Seed 2.1 Turbo. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.1 Codex mini up to 128,000, Seed 2.1 Turbo up to 256,000, Mistral Large 3 up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.1 Codex mini accepts text and images; Seed 2.1 Turbo accepts text, images and video; Mistral Large 3 accepts text and images. Seed 2.1 Turbo handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Mistral Large 3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.1 Codex mini and Seed 2.1 Turbo is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Seed 2.1 Turbo is the newest, released Jun 23, 2026. Mistral Large 3 came out Dec 2, 2025; GPT-5.1 Codex mini came out Nov 13, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.1 Codex mini Sep 30, 2024, Mistral Large 3 Nov 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.