GLM-4.5V vs Qwen MT Plus vs Morph V3 Fast
GLM-4.5V comes out ahead, 48 to 32 and 11 on our weighted score.
- Our pick
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.5V
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $1.80
- Context64K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen MT Plus
11/100- ECI—
- Price$2.46 / $7.37
- Context16K
Morph
Morph V3 Fast
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.80 / $1.20
- Context262K
GLM-4.5V is our pick
GLM-4.5V is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Morph V3 Fast (32) and Qwen MT Plus (11). It leads on inputs & features. Morph V3 Fast wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGLM-4.5V and Morph V3 FastGLM-4.5V $0.90 · Morph V3 Fast $0.90 · Qwen MT Plus $3.69 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMorph V3 FastMorph V3 Fast 262,144 · GLM-4.5V 64,000 · Qwen MT Plus 16,384 tokens
- Widest inputsGLM-4.5VGLM-4.5V: Text, Images, Video · Qwen MT Plus: Text · Morph V3 Fast: Text
- Self-hostingGLM-4.5VPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GLM-4.5V | Qwen MT Plus | Morph V3 Fast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 50 | 22 | 50 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 0 | 0 |
| Context window | 20% | 12 | 0 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 48/100 | 11/100 | 32/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GLM-4.5VZ.ai (Zhipu) | Qwen MT PlusAlibaba (Qwen) | Morph V3 FastMorph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.60 (best) | $2.46 | $0.80 |
| Output | $1.80 | $7.37 | $1.20 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.11 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.90 (best) | $3.69 | $0.90 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Z.AI API | Official Alibaba API | Median of 5 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 64,000 tokens | 16,384 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens | 8,192 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | No |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | glm-4.5v | qwen-mt-plus | — |
| API providers | 17 (best) | 3 | 5 |
| Released | Aug 11, 2025 | Jul 24, 2025 | Jul 7, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GLM-4.5V$9.60
- Qwen MT Plus$39.34
- Morph V3 Fast$10.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GLM-4.5V, Qwen MT Plus or Morph V3 Fast?
GLM-4.5V is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Morph V3 Fast (32) and Qwen MT Plus (11). It leads on inputs & features. Morph V3 Fast wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V, Qwen MT Plus or Morph V3 Fast?
GLM-4.5V is cheaper at $0.60 input / $1.80 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). Morph V3 Fast costs $0.80 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers); Qwen MT Plus costs $2.46 input / $7.37 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.90 per million tokens for GLM-4.5V versus $0.90 for Morph V3 Fast (1× as much) and $3.69 for Qwen MT Plus (4.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GLM-4.5V has not been scored yet, Qwen MT Plus has not been scored yet and Morph V3 Fast has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-4.5V, Qwen MT Plus and Morph V3 Fast yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen MT Plus and Morph V3 Fast does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Morph V3 Fast has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 64,000 for GLM-4.5V and 16,384 for Qwen MT Plus. Maximum output per response: GLM-4.5V up to 16,384, Qwen MT Plus up to 8,192, Morph V3 Fast up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GLM-4.5V accepts text, images and video; Qwen MT Plus accepts text; Morph V3 Fast accepts text. GLM-4.5V handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
GLM-4.5V publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen MT Plus and Morph V3 Fast is proprietary.
Which is newer?
GLM-4.5V is the newest, released Aug 11, 2025. Qwen MT Plus came out Jul 24, 2025; Morph V3 Fast came out Jul 7, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GLM-4.5V Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
