GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M2
Too close to call on our weighted score (GLM-4.5-Air 49, MiniMax-M2 48). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.5-Air
49/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $1.10
- Context131K
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $1.20
- Context205K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GLM-4.5-Air 49/100, MiniMax-M2 48/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GLM-4.5-Air on price and MiniMax-M2 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGLM-4.5-AirGLM-4.5-Air $0.425 · MiniMax-M2 $0.525 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiniMax-M2MiniMax-M2 204,800 · GLM-4.5-Air 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGLM-4.5-Air: Text · MiniMax-M2: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | GLM-4.5-Air | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 68 | 63 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 49/100 | 48/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GLM-4.5-AirZ.ai (Zhipu) | MiniMax-M2MiniMax |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.20 (best) | $0.30 |
| Output | $1.10 (best) | $1.20 |
| Cached input | $0.03 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.425 (best) | $0.525 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Z.AI API | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 204,800 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 98,304 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | glm-4.5-air | MiniMax-M2 |
| API providers | 13 | 13 |
| Released | Jul 28, 2025 | Oct 27, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GLM-4.5-Air$4.20
- MiniMax-M2$5.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GLM-4.5-Air or MiniMax-M2?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GLM-4.5-Air 49/100, MiniMax-M2 48/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GLM-4.5-Air on price and MiniMax-M2 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5-Air or MiniMax-M2?
GLM-4.5-Air is cheaper at $0.20 input / $1.10 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). MiniMax-M2 costs $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.425 per million tokens for GLM-4.5-Air versus $0.525 for MiniMax-M2 (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. GLM-4.5-Air has not been scored yet and MiniMax-M2 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-4.5-Air and MiniMax-M2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax-M2 has the largest context window at 204,800 tokens, against 131,072 for GLM-4.5-Air. Maximum output per response: GLM-4.5-Air up to 98,304, MiniMax-M2 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GLM-4.5-Air accepts text; MiniMax-M2 accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
MiniMax-M2 is the newest, released Oct 27, 2025. GLM-4.5-Air came out Jul 28, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GLM-4.5-Air Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Seed 1.6 VisionThree-way comparison
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Seed 1.6 VisionByteDance Seed
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITAI Singapore
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3 Coder FlashAlibaba (Qwen)
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructNVIDIA
- MiniMax-M2 vs Qwen3-VL PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
- MiniMax-M2 vs GLM-4.6VZ.ai (Zhipu)
