GLM-4.5-Air vs Codestral
Too close to call on our weighted score (Codestral 49, GLM-4.5-Air 48). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.5-Air
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $1.10
- Context131K
Mistral AICodestral
49/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $0.90
- Context256K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Codestral 49/100, GLM-4.5-Air 48/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GLM-4.5-Air on price and Codestral for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGLM-4.5-AirGLM-4.5-Air $0.425 · Codestral $0.45 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextCodestralCodestral 256,000 · GLM-4.5-Air 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGLM-4.5-Air: Text · Codestral: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | GLM-4.5-Air | Codestral |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 65 | 64 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 25 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 48/100 | 49/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GLM-4.5-AirZ.ai (Zhipu) | CodestralMistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.20 (best) | $0.30 |
| Output | $1.10 | $0.90 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.03 | $0.03 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.425 (best) | $0.45 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Z.AI API | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 98,304 tokens (best) | 4,096 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | glm-4.5-air | codestral-latest |
| API providers | 19 (best) | 4 |
| Released | Jul 28, 2025 | May 29, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | Oct 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GLM-4.5-Air$4.20
- Codestral$4.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GLM-4.5-Air or Codestral?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Codestral 49/100, GLM-4.5-Air 48/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GLM-4.5-Air on price and Codestral for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5-Air or Codestral?
GLM-4.5-Air is cheaper at $0.20 input / $1.10 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). Codestral costs $0.30 input / $0.90 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.425 per million tokens for GLM-4.5-Air versus $0.45 for Codestral (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. GLM-4.5-Air has not been scored yet and Codestral has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-4.5-Air and Codestral yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Codestral has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 131,072 for GLM-4.5-Air. Maximum output per response: GLM-4.5-Air up to 98,304, Codestral up to 4,096 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GLM-4.5-Air accepts text; Codestral accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
GLM-4.5-Air is the newest, released Jul 28, 2025. Codestral came out May 29, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: GLM-4.5-Air Apr 2025, Codestral Oct 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Codestral 25.08Three-way comparison
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Codestral 25.08Mistral AI
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5NVIDIA
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B ThinkingAlibaba (Qwen)
- GLM-4.5-Air vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BBaidu
- Codestral vs Qwen PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
- Codestral vs Hermes 3 70B InstructNous Research
