Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite comes out ahead, 83 to 65 and 58 on our weighted score, though Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is 14% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
83/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context1.05M
NVIDIA
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
58/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context131K
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B
65/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.305
- Context256K
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is our pick
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against Mistral Small 3.2 24B (65) and Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (58). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 $0.15 · Mistral Small 3.2 24B $0.151 · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite $0.175 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 1,048,576 · Mistral Small 3.2 24B 256,000 · Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1: Text · Mistral Small 3.2 24B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Mistral Small 3.2 24BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 | Mistral Small 3.2 24B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 82 | 85 | 85 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 100 | 35 | 50 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 25 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 83/100 | 58/100 | 65/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.10 (best) | $0.15 | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | $0.40 | $0.15 (best) | $0.305 |
| Cached input | $0.01 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.175 | $0.15 (best) | $0.151 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Google API | Median of 1 providers | Median of 8 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| API model ID | gemini-2.5-flash-lite | — | — |
| API providers | 24 (best) | 1 | 8 |
| Released | Jun 17, 2025 | Mar 18, 2025 | Jun 20, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | — | Oct 31, 2023 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite$1.80
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1$1.80
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$1.61
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against Mistral Small 3.2 24B (65) and Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (58). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs $0.10 input / $0.305 output per million tokens (median across 8 API providers); Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 versus $0.151 for Mistral Small 3.2 24B (1× as much) and $0.175 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has not been scored yet, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has not been scored yet and Mistral Small 3.2 24B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 256,000 for Mistral Small 3.2 24B and 131,072 for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite up to 65,536, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 up to 131,072, Mistral Small 3.2 24B up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 accepts text; Mistral Small 3.2 24B accepts text and images. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B is the newest, released Jun 20, 2025. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite came out Jun 17, 2025; Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 came out Mar 18, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jan 2025, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Oct 31, 2023.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.