ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Reka Flash 3

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 comes out ahead, 58 to 50 on our weighted score, though Reka Flash 3 is 17% cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    NVIDIA

    Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

    Released Mar 18, 2025

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context131K
    Full specs Remove Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

  2. Reka AI

    Reka Flash 3

    Released Mar 10, 2025

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.20
    • Context66K
    Full specs Remove Reka Flash 3

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is our pick

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Reka Flash 3 (50). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Reka Flash 3 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceReka Flash 3Reka Flash 3 $0.125 · Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 $0.15 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 131,072 · Reka Flash 3 65,536 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1: Text · Reka Flash 3: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1Reka Flash 3
Price50%8589
Inputs & features30%3510
Context window20%2512
Overall100%58/10050/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Reka Flash 3 specifications side by side
SpecificationLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1NVIDIAReka Flash 3Reka AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15$0.10 (best)
Output$0.15 (best)$0.20
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.15$0.125 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersMedian of 3 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)65,536 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens (best)58,982 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpen
API model ID——
API providers13 (best)
ReleasedMar 18, 2025Mar 10, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Jan 31, 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1$1.80
  • Reka Flash 3$1.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 or Reka Flash 3?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Reka Flash 3 (50). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Reka Flash 3 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 or Reka Flash 3?

Reka Flash 3 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 costs $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.125 per million tokens for Reka Flash 3 versus $0.15 for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has not been scored yet and Reka Flash 3 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Reka Flash 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Reka Flash 3 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 65,536 for Reka Flash 3. Maximum output per response: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 up to 131,072, Reka Flash 3 up to 58,982 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 accepts text; Reka Flash 3 accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is the newest, released Mar 18, 2025. Reka Flash 3 came out Mar 10, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Reka Flash 3 Jan 31, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons