DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen MT Plus vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview comes out ahead, 46 to 39 and 11 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro
39/100- ECI—
- Price$1.60 / $3.30
- Context1M
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen MT Plus
11/100- ECI—
- Price$2.46 / $7.37
- Context16K
- Our pick
GoogleGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview
46/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $5.00
- Context131K
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is our pick
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 46/100 against DeepSeek V4 Pro (39) and Qwen MT Plus (11). It leads on inputs & features. DeepSeek V4 Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview $2.00 · DeepSeek V4 Pro $2.03 · Qwen MT Plus $3.69 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextDeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek V4 Pro 1,000,000 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 131,072 · Qwen MT Plus 16,384 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewDeepSeek V4 Pro: Text · Qwen MT Plus: Text · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview: Text, Images, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingDeepSeek V4 ProPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Qwen MT Plus | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 34 | 22 | 34 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 0 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 0 | 25 |
| Overall | 100% | 39/100 | 11/100 | 46/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek | Qwen MT PlusAlibaba (Qwen) | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.60 | $2.46 | $1.00 (best) |
| Output | $3.30 (best) | $7.37 | $5.00 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.03 | $3.69 | $2.00 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 56 providers | Official Alibaba API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 384,000 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | qwen-mt-plus | — |
| API providers | 58 (best) | 3 | 1 |
| Released | Apr 24, 2026 | Jul 24, 2025 | Apr 14, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2025 | — | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro$22.60
- Qwen MT Plus$39.34
- Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview$20.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: DeepSeek V4 Pro, Qwen MT Plus or Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview?
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 46/100 against DeepSeek V4 Pro (39) and Qwen MT Plus (11). It leads on inputs & features. DeepSeek V4 Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Qwen MT Plus or Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview?
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is cheaper at $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.60 input / $3.30 output per million tokens (median across 56 API providers); Qwen MT Plus costs $2.46 input / $7.37 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.00 per million tokens for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview versus $2.03 for DeepSeek V4 Pro (1× as much) and $3.69 for Qwen MT Plus (1.8× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. DeepSeek V4 Pro has not been scored yet, Qwen MT Plus has not been scored yet and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek V4 Pro, Qwen MT Plus and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen MT Plus does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek V4 Pro has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and 16,384 for Qwen MT Plus. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek V4 Pro up to 384,000, Qwen MT Plus up to 8,192, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts text; Qwen MT Plus accepts text; Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview accepts text, images, audio and video. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
DeepSeek V4 Pro publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen MT Plus and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is proprietary.
Which is newer?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the newest, released Apr 24, 2026. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview came out Apr 14, 2026; Qwen MT Plus came out Jul 24, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: DeepSeek V4 Pro May 2025, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
