DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro comes out ahead, 42 to 39 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro
39/100- ECI—
- Price$1.60 / $3.30
- Context1M
- Our pick
XiaomiMiMo-V2-Pro
42/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $3.00
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
MiMo-V2-Pro is our pick
MiMo-V2-Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 42/100 against DeepSeek V4 Pro (39). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiMo-V2-ProMiMo-V2-Pro $1.50 · DeepSeek V4 Pro $2.03 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2-ProMiMo-V2-Pro 1,048,576 · DeepSeek V4 Pro 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsDeepSeek V4 Pro: Text · MiMo-V2-Pro: Text
- Self-hostingDeepSeek V4 ProPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | DeepSeek V4 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 34 | 40 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 39/100 | 42/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek | MiMo-V2-ProXiaomi |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.60 | $1.00 (best) |
| Output | $3.30 | $3.00 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.03 | $1.50 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 56 providers | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 384,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 58 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Apr 24, 2026 | Mar 18, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2025 | Dec 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro$22.60
- MiMo-V2-Pro$16.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: DeepSeek V4 Pro or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 42/100 against DeepSeek V4 Pro (39). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $1.00 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.60 input / $3.30 output per million tokens (median across 56 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.50 per million tokens for MiMo-V2-Pro versus $2.03 for DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. DeepSeek V4 Pro has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2-Pro has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek V4 Pro and MiMo-V2-Pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for DeepSeek V4 Pro. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek V4 Pro up to 384,000, MiMo-V2-Pro up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts text; MiMo-V2-Pro accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
DeepSeek V4 Pro publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; MiMo-V2-Pro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the newest, released Apr 24, 2026. MiMo-V2-Pro came out Mar 18, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: DeepSeek V4 Pro May 2025, MiMo-V2-Pro Dec 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewThree-way comparison
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogle
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM-5V-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)xAI
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)xAI
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs GLM-5-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)
