ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview

Gemini 4 Argon comes out ahead, 52 to 46 and 39 on our weighted score, though Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is 2× cheaper per token.

  1. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek V4 Pro

    Released Apr 24, 2026

    39/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.60 / $3.30
    • Context1M
  2. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 4 Argon

    Released Oct 13, 2026New

    52/100
    • ECI166.1
    • Price$2.00 / $10.00
    • Context1.05M
  3. Google

    Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview

    Released Apr 14, 2026

    46/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $5.00
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Gemini 4 Argon is our pick

Gemini 4 Argon is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview (46) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (39). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview $2.00 · DeepSeek V4 Pro $2.03 · Gemini 4 Argon $4.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemini 4 ArgonGemini 4 Argon 1,048,576 · DeepSeek V4 Pro 1,000,000 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 4 ArgonDeepSeek V4 Pro: Text · Gemini 4 Argon: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview: Text, Images, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingDeepSeek V4 ProPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightDeepSeek V4 ProGemini 4 ArgonGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview
Price50%342034
Inputs & features30%3510080
Context window20%606125
Overall100%39/10052/10046/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview specifications side by side
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeekGemini 4 ArgonGoogleGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—166.1—
ECI rank—#7 of 165—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—96.4%—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—86.0%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—100%—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions—76.0%—
Price per million tokens
Input$1.60$2.00$1.00 (best)
Output$3.30 (best)$10.00$5.00
Cached input—$0.10—
Blended (3:1)$2.03$4.00$2.00 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 56 providersOfficial Google APIMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)131,072 tokens
Max output384,000 tokens (best)65,536 tokens65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoYesNo
AudioNoYesYes
VideoNoYesYes
ReasoningYesYeslow · medium · highYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryProprietary
API model ID—gemini-4-argon—
API providers58 (best)241
ReleasedApr 24, 2026Oct 13, 2026Apr 14, 2026
Knowledge cutoffMay 2025Mar 2026Jan 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • DeepSeek V4 Pro$22.60
  • Gemini 4 Argon$40.00
  • Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview$20.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: DeepSeek V4 Pro, Gemini 4 Argon or Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview?

Gemini 4 Argon is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview (46) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (39). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Gemini 4 Argon or Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview?

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is cheaper at $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.60 input / $3.30 output per million tokens (median across 56 API providers); Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.00 per million tokens for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview versus $2.03 for DeepSeek V4 Pro (1× as much) and $4.00 for Gemini 4 Argon (2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. DeepSeek V4 Pro has not been scored yet, Gemini 4 Argon has an ECI of 166.1 and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek V4 Pro, Gemini 4 Argon and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for DeepSeek V4 Pro and 131,072 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek V4 Pro up to 384,000, Gemini 4 Argon up to 65,536, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts text; Gemini 4 Argon accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview accepts text, images, audio and video. Gemini 4 Argon handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

DeepSeek V4 Pro publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 4 Argon and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemini 4 Argon is the newest, released Oct 13, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro came out Apr 24, 2026; Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview came out Apr 14, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: DeepSeek V4 Pro May 2025, Gemini 4 Argon Mar 2026, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.