Codestral 25.08 vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 comes out ahead, 55 to 47 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Mistral AICodestral 25.08
47/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $0.90
- Context128K
- Our pickMistral AI
Voxtral Small 24B 2507
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context33K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is our pick
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Codestral 25.08 (47). It leads on price and inputs & features. Codestral 25.08 wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceVoxtral Small 24B 2507Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.175 · Codestral 25.08 $0.45 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextCodestral 25.08Codestral 25.08 128,000 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsVoxtral Small 24B 2507Codestral 25.08: Text · Voxtral Small 24B 2507: Text, Audio
- Self-hostingVoxtral Small 24B 2507Publishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Codestral 25.08 | Voxtral Small 24B 2507 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 64 | 82 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 45 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 47/100 | 55/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Codestral 25.08Mistral AI | Voxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.30 | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | $0.90 | $0.40 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.03 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.45 | $0.175 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Mistral API | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 32,768 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenApache 2.0 |
| API model ID | codestral-2508 | voxtral-small-latest |
| API providers | 11 (best) | 10 |
| Released | Jul 30, 2025 | Jul 15, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Codestral 25.08$4.80
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507$1.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Codestral 25.08 or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Codestral 25.08 (47). It leads on price and inputs & features. Codestral 25.08 wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Codestral 25.08 or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Codestral 25.08 costs $0.30 input / $0.90 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for Voxtral Small 24B 2507 versus $0.45 for Codestral 25.08 (2.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Codestral 25.08 has not been scored yet and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Codestral 25.08 and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Codestral 25.08 has the largest context window at 128,000 tokens, against 32,768 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507. Maximum output per response: Codestral 25.08 up to 8,192, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Codestral 25.08 accepts text; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 accepts text and audio. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Codestral 25.08 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Codestral 25.08 is the newest, released Jul 30, 2025. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 came out Jul 15, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GLM-4.5-AirThree-way comparison
- Codestral 25.08 vs GLM-4.5-AirZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Codestral 25.08 vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5NVIDIA
- Codestral 25.08 vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BBaidu
- Codestral 25.08 vs Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B ThinkingAlibaba (Qwen)
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Qwen FlashAlibaba (Qwen)
