Codestral 25.08 vs ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B comes out ahead, 57 to 47 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Mistral AICodestral 25.08
47/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $0.90
- Context128K
- Our pick
BaiduERNIE 4.5 21B A3B
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.07 / $0.28
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B is our pick
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Codestral 25.08 (47). It leads on price. Codestral 25.08 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceERNIE 4.5 21B A3BERNIE 4.5 21B A3B $0.122 · Codestral 25.08 $0.45 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextERNIE 4.5 21B A3BERNIE 4.5 21B A3B 131,072 · Codestral 25.08 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsCodestral 25.08: Text · ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B: Text
- Self-hostingERNIE 4.5 21B A3BPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Codestral 25.08 | ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 64 | 89 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 25 |
| Overall | 100% | 47/100 | 57/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Codestral 25.08Mistral AI | ERNIE 4.5 21B A3BBaidu |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.30 | $0.07 (best) |
| Output | $0.90 | $0.28 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.03 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.45 | $0.122 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Mistral API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens (best) | 8,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenApache-2.0 |
| API model ID | codestral-2508 | — |
| API providers | 11 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Jul 30, 2025 | Jun 30, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Codestral 25.08$4.80
- ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B$1.26
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Codestral 25.08 or ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B?
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Codestral 25.08 (47). It leads on price. Codestral 25.08 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Codestral 25.08 or ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B?
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B is cheaper at $0.07 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Codestral 25.08 costs $0.30 input / $0.90 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.122 per million tokens for ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B versus $0.45 for Codestral 25.08 (3.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Codestral 25.08 has not been scored yet and ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Codestral 25.08 and ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Codestral 25.08. Maximum output per response: Codestral 25.08 up to 8,192, ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B up to 8,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Codestral 25.08 accepts text; ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Codestral 25.08 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Codestral 25.08 is the newest, released Jul 30, 2025. ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B came out Jun 30, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GLM-4.5-AirThree-way comparison
- Codestral 25.08 vs GLM-4.5-AirZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Codestral 25.08 vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5NVIDIA
- Codestral 25.08 vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BBaidu
- Codestral 25.08 vs Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B ThinkingAlibaba (Qwen)
- ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B vs Qwen FlashAlibaba (Qwen)
- ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B vs Apertus 8BSwiss AI
