Codestral-22B-v0.1 vs solar-mini vs Vision Small
Vision Small comes out ahead, 84 to 15 and 0 on our weighted score, though solar-mini is 11× cheaper per token.
Mistral AICodestral-22B-v0.1
0/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context33K
Upstagesolar-mini
15/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context33K
- Our pick
VisparkVision Small
84/100- ECI—
- Price$1.05 / $3.16
- Context1M
Vision Small is our pick
Vision Small is the better all-round choice, scoring 84/100 against solar-mini (15) and Codestral-22B-v0.1 (0). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest pricesolar-minisolar-mini $0.15 · Vision Small $1.58 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Codestral-22B-v0.1 unpriced
- Longest contextVision SmallVision Small 1,000,000 · Codestral-22B-v0.1 32,768 · solar-mini 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsVision SmallCodestral-22B-v0.1: Text · solar-mini: Text · Vision Small: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingCodestral-22B-v0.1Publishes downloadable weights (Mistral AI Non-Production License)
| Measure | Weight | Codestral-22B-v0.1 | solar-mini | Vision Small |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 0 | 25 | 100 |
| Context window | 40% | 0 | 0 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 0/100 | 15/100 | 84/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Codestral-22B-v0.1Mistral AI | solar-miniUpstage | Vision SmallVispark |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | — | $0.15 (best) | $1.05 |
| Output | — | $0.15 (best) | $3.16 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.15 (best) | $1.58 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Official Upstage API | Official Vispark API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 32,768 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 4,096 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenMistral AI Non-Production License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | solar-mini | vispark/vision-small |
| API providers | — | 1 | 1 |
| Released | May 29, 2024 | Jun 12, 2024 | May 15, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Sep 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Codestral-22B-v0.1—
- solar-mini$1.80
- Vision Small$16.82
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Codestral-22B-v0.1, solar-mini or Vision Small?
Vision Small is the better all-round choice, scoring 84/100 against solar-mini (15) and Codestral-22B-v0.1 (0). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Codestral-22B-v0.1, solar-mini or Vision Small?
solar-mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). Vision Small costs $1.05 input / $3.16 output per million tokens (official Vispark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for solar-mini versus $1.58 for Vision Small (11× as much). Codestral-22B-v0.1 has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Codestral-22B-v0.1 has not been scored yet, solar-mini has not been scored yet and Vision Small has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Codestral-22B-v0.1, solar-mini and Vision Small yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Codestral-22B-v0.1 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Vision Small has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 32,768 for Codestral-22B-v0.1 and 32,768 for solar-mini. Maximum output per response: Codestral-22B-v0.1 up to 8,192, solar-mini up to 4,096, Vision Small up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Codestral-22B-v0.1 accepts text; solar-mini accepts text; Vision Small accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Vision Small handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Codestral-22B-v0.1 publishes its weights (Mistral AI Non-Production License) and can be self-hosted; solar-mini and Vision Small is proprietary.
Which is newer?
solar-mini is the newest, released Jun 12, 2024. Codestral-22B-v0.1 came out May 29, 2024; Vision Small came out May 15, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: solar-mini Sep 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
