CoBuddy vs DeepSeek OCR 2 vs MiniMax-M2 Her
CoBuddy comes out ahead, 46 to 43 and 38 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
BaiduCoBuddy
46/100- ECI—
- Price$0.28 / $1.13
- Context131K
DeepSeekDeepSeek OCR 2
38/100- ECI—
- Price$0.46 / $0.749
- Context8K
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2 Her
43/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $1.20
- Context66K
CoBuddy is our pick
CoBuddy is the better all-round choice, scoring 46/100 against MiniMax-M2 Her (43) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (38). It leads on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceCoBuddyCoBuddy $0.492 · MiniMax-M2 Her $0.525 · DeepSeek OCR 2 $0.532 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextCoBuddyCoBuddy 131,072 · MiniMax-M2 Her 65,536 · DeepSeek OCR 2 8,192 tokens
- Widest inputsDeepSeek OCR 2CoBuddy: Text · DeepSeek OCR 2: Text, Images · MiniMax-M2 Her: Text
- Self-hostingDeepSeek OCR 2Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | CoBuddy | DeepSeek OCR 2 | MiniMax-M2 Her |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 62 | 60 | 60 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 25 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 25 | 0 | 12 |
| Overall | 100% | 46/100 | 38/100 | 43/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | CoBuddyBaidu | DeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek | MiniMax-M2 HerMiniMax |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.28 (best) | $0.46 | $0.30 |
| Output | $1.13 | $0.749 (best) | $1.20 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.492 (best) | $0.532 | $0.525 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 2 providers | Median of 3 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens | 2,048 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — | — |
| API providers | 1 | 3 (best) | 3 (best) |
| Released | May 6, 2026 | Jan 27, 2026 | Jan 23, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- CoBuddy$5.06
- DeepSeek OCR 2$6.10
- MiniMax-M2 Her$5.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: CoBuddy, DeepSeek OCR 2 or MiniMax-M2 Her?
CoBuddy is the better all-round choice, scoring 46/100 against MiniMax-M2 Her (43) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (38). It leads on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, CoBuddy, DeepSeek OCR 2 or MiniMax-M2 Her?
CoBuddy is cheaper at $0.28 input / $1.13 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). MiniMax-M2 Her costs $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers); DeepSeek OCR 2 costs $0.46 input / $0.749 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.492 per million tokens for CoBuddy versus $0.525 for MiniMax-M2 Her (1.1× as much) and $0.532 for DeepSeek OCR 2 (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. CoBuddy has not been scored yet, DeepSeek OCR 2 has not been scored yet and MiniMax-M2 Her has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for CoBuddy, DeepSeek OCR 2 and MiniMax-M2 Her yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that DeepSeek OCR 2 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
CoBuddy has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 65,536 for MiniMax-M2 Her and 8,192 for DeepSeek OCR 2. Maximum output per response: CoBuddy up to 65,536, DeepSeek OCR 2 up to 8,192, MiniMax-M2 Her up to 2,048 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
CoBuddy accepts text; DeepSeek OCR 2 accepts text and images; MiniMax-M2 Her accepts text. DeepSeek OCR 2 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
DeepSeek OCR 2 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; CoBuddy and MiniMax-M2 Her is proprietary.
Which is newer?
CoBuddy is the newest, released May 6, 2026. DeepSeek OCR 2 came out Jan 27, 2026; MiniMax-M2 Her came out Jan 23, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
