CoBuddy vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite comes out ahead, 72 to 46 on our weighted score, though CoBuddy is 12% cheaper per token.
BaiduCoBuddy
46/100- ECI—
- Price$0.28 / $1.13
- Context131K
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
72/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $1.50
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is our pick
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against CoBuddy (46). It leads on inputs & features and context window. CoBuddy wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceCoBuddyCoBuddy $0.492 · Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $0.563 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite 1,048,576 · CoBuddy 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteCoBuddy: Text · Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | CoBuddy | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 62 | 59 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 100 |
| Context window | 20% | 25 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 46/100 | 72/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | CoBuddyBaidu | Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.28 | $0.25 (best) |
| Output | $1.13 (best) | $1.50 |
| Cached input | — | $0.025 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.492 (best) | $0.563 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Google API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | gemini-3.1-flash-lite |
| API providers | 1 | 26 (best) |
| Released | May 6, 2026 | May 7, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- CoBuddy$5.06
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$5.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: CoBuddy or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against CoBuddy (46). It leads on inputs & features and context window. CoBuddy wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, CoBuddy or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
CoBuddy is cheaper at $0.28 input / $1.13 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.492 per million tokens for CoBuddy versus $0.563 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. CoBuddy has not been scored yet and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for CoBuddy and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 131,072 for CoBuddy. Maximum output per response: CoBuddy up to 65,536, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
CoBuddy accepts text; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. CoBuddy and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the newest, released May 7, 2026. CoBuddy came out May 6, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Perceptron Mk1Three-way comparison
- CoBuddy vs Perceptron Mk1Perceptron
- CoBuddy vs Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
- CoBuddy vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNVIDIA
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Perceptron Mk1Perceptron
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs LongCat-2.0Meituan (LongCat)
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Macaron V1 TallMindlab
