Aion-3.0 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Command A Plus
Command A Plus comes out ahead, 35 to 31 and 26 on our weighted score, though Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 31% cheaper per token.
Aion Labs
Aion-3.0
26/100- ECI—
- Price$3.00 / $6.00
- Context131K
Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
31/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context262K
- Our pick
Cohere
Command A Plus
35/100- ECI—
- Price$2.50 / $10.00
- Context128K
Command A Plus is our pick
Command A Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 35/100 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (31) and Aion-3.0 (26). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B wins on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3.8 2.4T A95B $3.00 · Aion-3.0 $3.75 · Command A Plus $4.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3.8 2.4T A95B 262,144 · Aion-3.0 131,072 · Command A Plus 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsCommand A PlusAion-3.0: Text · Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Text · Command A Plus: Text, Images
- Self-hostingQwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Command A PlusPublishes downloadable weights (qwen3.8-max)
| Measure | Weight | Aion-3.0 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Command A Plus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 22 | 26 | 19 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 25 | 37 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 26/100 | 31/100 | 35/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Aion-3.0Aion Labs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $3.00 | $2.00 (best) | $2.50 |
| Output | $6.00 (best) | $6.00 (best) | $10.00 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.75 | $3.00 (best) | $4.38 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 4 providers | Median of 23 providers | Official Cohere API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 64,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Openqwen3.8-max | Open |
| API model ID | — | — | command-a-plus-05-2026 |
| API providers | 4 | 23 (best) | 3 |
| Released | May 5, 2026 | Aug 12, 2026 | May 20, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | Apr 1, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Aion-3.0$42.00
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$32.00
Command A Plus$45.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Aion-3.0, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Command A Plus?
Command A Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 35/100 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (31) and Aion-3.0 (26). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B wins on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Aion-3.0, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Command A Plus?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is cheaper at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 23 API providers). Aion-3.0 costs $3.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers); Command A Plus costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B versus $3.75 for Aion-3.0 (1.3× as much) and $4.38 for Command A Plus (1.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Aion-3.0 has not been scored yet, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has not been scored yet and Command A Plus has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Aion-3.0, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Command A Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for Aion-3.0 and 128,000 for Command A Plus. Maximum output per response: Aion-3.0 up to 32,768, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B up to 131,072, Command A Plus up to 64,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Aion-3.0 accepts text; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B accepts text; Command A Plus accepts text and images. Command A Plus handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Command A Plus publishes its weights (qwen3.8-max) and can be self-hosted; Aion-3.0 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is the newest, released Aug 12, 2026. Command A Plus came out May 20, 2026; Aion-3.0 came out May 5, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Command A Plus Apr 1, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.