Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 vs Nemotron VoiceChat
Nemotron VoiceChat comes out ahead, 65 to 61 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Mistral AIVoxtral Mini 3B 2507
61/100- ECI—
- Price$0.04 / $0.04
- Context33K
- Our pick
NVIDIANemotron VoiceChat
65/100- ECI—
- PriceFree / Free
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Nemotron VoiceChat is our pick
Nemotron VoiceChat is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 (61). It leads on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNemotron VoiceChatNemotron VoiceChat Free · Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 $0.04 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNemotron VoiceChatNemotron VoiceChat 128,000 · Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsVoxtral Mini 3B 2507: Text, Audio · Nemotron VoiceChat: Text, Audio
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 | Nemotron VoiceChat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 0 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 61/100 | 65/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Voxtral Mini 3B 2507Mistral AI | Nemotron VoiceChatNVIDIA |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.04 | Free (best) |
| Output | $0.04 | Free (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.04 | Free (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Official Nvidia API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenApache 2.0 | Open |
| API model ID | — | nvidia/nemotron-voicechat |
| API providers | 3 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Jul 15, 2025 | Mar 16, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Voxtral Mini 3B 2507$0.48
- Nemotron VoiceChatFree
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 or Nemotron VoiceChat?
Nemotron VoiceChat is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 (61). It leads on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 or Nemotron VoiceChat?
Nemotron VoiceChat is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Nvidia API price). Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 costs $0.04 input / $0.04 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Nemotron VoiceChat is listed as free.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 has not been scored yet and Nemotron VoiceChat has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 and Nemotron VoiceChat yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nemotron VoiceChat has the largest context window at 128,000 tokens, against 32,768 for Voxtral Mini 3B 2507. Maximum output per response: Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 up to 32,768, Nemotron VoiceChat up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 accepts text and audio; Nemotron VoiceChat accepts text and audio. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Nemotron VoiceChat is the newest, released Mar 16, 2026. Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 came out Jul 15, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Granite-4.0-H-MicroThree-way comparison
- Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 vs Granite-4.0-H-MicroIBM
- Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 vs Baichuan M2 32BBaichuan
- Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 vs Qwen3.5 2BAlibaba (Qwen)
- Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 vs Gemma 4 E4B ITGoogle
- Nemotron VoiceChat vs Laguna M.1Poolside
- Nemotron VoiceChat vs North Mini CodeCohere
