Vision Small vs solar-mini vs Codestral
Vision Small comes out ahead, 84 to 29 and 15 on our weighted score.
- Our pick
VisparkVision Small
84/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context1M
Upstage
solar-mini
15/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context33K
Mistral AICodestral
29/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $0.90
- Context256K
Vision Small is our pick
Vision Small is the better all-round choice, scoring 84/100 against Codestral (29) and solar-mini (15). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest pricesolar-minisolar-mini $0.15 · Codestral $0.45 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Vision Small unpriced
- Longest contextVision SmallVision Small 1,000,000 · Codestral 256,000 · solar-mini 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsVision SmallVision Small: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · solar-mini: Text · Codestral: Text
- Self-hostingCodestralPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Vision Small | solar-mini | Codestral |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 100 | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 40% | 60 | 0 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 84/100 | 15/100 | 29/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Vision SmallVispark | solar-miniUpstage | CodestralMistral AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | — | $0.15 (best) | $0.30 |
| Output | — | $0.15 (best) | $0.90 |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.03 |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.15 (best) | $0.45 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Official Upstage API | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 4,096 tokens | 4,096 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | solar-mini | codestral-latest |
| API providers | — | 1 | 3 (best) |
| Released | May 15, 2024 | Jun 12, 2024 | May 29, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Sep 2024 | Oct 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Vision Small—
- solar-mini$1.80
- Codestral$4.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Vision Small, solar-mini or Codestral?
Vision Small is the better all-round choice, scoring 84/100 against Codestral (29) and solar-mini (15). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Vision Small, solar-mini or Codestral?
solar-mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). Codestral costs $0.30 input / $0.90 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for solar-mini versus $0.45 for Codestral (3× as much). Vision Small has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Vision Small has not been scored yet, solar-mini has not been scored yet and Codestral has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Vision Small, solar-mini and Codestral yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Vision Small has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 256,000 for Codestral and 32,768 for solar-mini. Maximum output per response: Vision Small up to 65,536, solar-mini up to 4,096, Codestral up to 4,096 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Vision Small accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; solar-mini accepts text; Codestral accepts text. Vision Small handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Codestral publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Vision Small and solar-mini is proprietary.
Which is newer?
solar-mini is the newest, released Jun 12, 2024. Codestral came out May 29, 2024; Vision Small came out May 15, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: solar-mini Sep 2024, Codestral Oct 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
