Vision Small vs Palmyra X4 vs Qwen Max
Vision Small comes out ahead, 61 to 25 and 24 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
VisparkVision Small
61/100- ECI—
- Price$1.05 / $3.16
- Context1M
Writer
Palmyra X4
25/100- ECI—
- Price$2.50 / $10.00
- Context128K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen Max
24/100- ECI—
- Price$1.60 / $6.40
- Context33K
Vision Small is our pick
Vision Small is the better all-round choice, scoring 61/100 against Palmyra X4 (25) and Qwen Max (24). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceVision SmallVision Small $1.58 · Qwen Max $2.80 · Palmyra X4 $4.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextVision SmallVision Small 1,000,000 · Palmyra X4 128,000 · Qwen Max 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsVision SmallVision Small: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Palmyra X4: Text · Qwen Max: Text
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Vision Small | Palmyra X4 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 39 | 19 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 100 | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 24 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 61/100 | 25/100 | 24/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Vision SmallVispark | Palmyra X4Writer | Qwen MaxAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.05 (best) | $2.50 | $1.60 |
| Output | $3.16 (best) | $10.00 | $6.40 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.58 (best) | $4.38 | $2.80 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Vispark API | Median of 2 providers | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 4,096 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | vispark/vision-small | — | qwen-max |
| API providers | 1 | 2 | 8 (best) |
| Released | May 15, 2024 | Oct 9, 2024 | Apr 3, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | Apr 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Vision Small$16.82
- Palmyra X4$45.00
- Qwen Max$28.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Vision Small, Palmyra X4 or Qwen Max?
Vision Small is the better all-round choice, scoring 61/100 against Palmyra X4 (25) and Qwen Max (24). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Vision Small, Palmyra X4 or Qwen Max?
Vision Small is cheaper at $1.05 input / $3.16 output per million tokens (official Vispark API price). Qwen Max costs $1.60 input / $6.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Palmyra X4 costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.58 per million tokens for Vision Small versus $2.80 for Qwen Max (1.8× as much) and $4.38 for Palmyra X4 (2.8× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Vision Small has not been scored yet, Palmyra X4 has not been scored yet and Qwen Max has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Vision Small, Palmyra X4 and Qwen Max yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Vision Small has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Palmyra X4 and 32,768 for Qwen Max. Maximum output per response: Vision Small up to 65,536, Palmyra X4 up to 4,096, Qwen Max up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Vision Small accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Palmyra X4 accepts text; Qwen Max accepts text. Vision Small handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Vision Small, Palmyra X4 and Qwen Max are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Palmyra X4 is the newest, released Oct 9, 2024. Vision Small came out May 15, 2024; Qwen Max came out Apr 3, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen Max Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
