Vision Small vs Aya Expanse 32B vs Qwen Max
Vision Small comes out ahead, 61 to 32 and 24 on our weighted score, though Aya Expanse 32B is 2.1× cheaper per token.
- Our pick
VisparkVision Small
61/100- ECI—
- Price$1.05 / $3.16
- Context1M
CohereAya Expanse 32B
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context128K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen Max
24/100- ECI—
- Price$1.60 / $6.40
- Context33K
Vision Small is our pick
Vision Small is the better all-round choice, scoring 61/100 against Aya Expanse 32B (32) and Qwen Max (24). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Aya Expanse 32B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceAya Expanse 32BAya Expanse 32B $0.75 · Vision Small $1.58 · Qwen Max $2.80 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextVision SmallVision Small 1,000,000 · Aya Expanse 32B 128,000 · Qwen Max 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsVision SmallVision Small: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Aya Expanse 32B: Text · Qwen Max: Text
- Self-hostingAya Expanse 32BPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
| Measure | Weight | Vision Small | Aya Expanse 32B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 39 | 53 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 100 | 0 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 24 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 61/100 | 32/100 | 24/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Vision SmallVispark | Aya Expanse 32BCohere | Qwen MaxAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.05 | $0.50 (best) | $1.60 |
| Output | $3.16 | $1.50 (best) | $6.40 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.58 | $0.75 (best) | $2.80 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Vispark API | Official Cohere API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 4,000 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | vispark/vision-small | c4ai-aya-expanse-32b | qwen-max |
| API providers | 1 | 2 | 8 (best) |
| Released | May 15, 2024 | Oct 24, 2024 | Apr 3, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | Apr 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Vision Small$16.82
- Aya Expanse 32B$8.00
- Qwen Max$28.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Vision Small, Aya Expanse 32B or Qwen Max?
Vision Small is the better all-round choice, scoring 61/100 against Aya Expanse 32B (32) and Qwen Max (24). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Aya Expanse 32B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Vision Small, Aya Expanse 32B or Qwen Max?
Aya Expanse 32B is cheaper at $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). Vision Small costs $1.05 input / $3.16 output per million tokens (official Vispark API price); Qwen Max costs $1.60 input / $6.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.75 per million tokens for Aya Expanse 32B versus $1.58 for Vision Small (2.1× as much) and $2.80 for Qwen Max (3.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Vision Small has not been scored yet, Aya Expanse 32B has not been scored yet and Qwen Max has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Vision Small, Aya Expanse 32B and Qwen Max yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Expanse 32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Vision Small has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Aya Expanse 32B and 32,768 for Qwen Max. Maximum output per response: Vision Small up to 65,536, Aya Expanse 32B up to 4,000, Qwen Max up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Vision Small accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Aya Expanse 32B accepts text; Qwen Max accepts text. Vision Small handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Aya Expanse 32B publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; Vision Small and Qwen Max is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Aya Expanse 32B is the newest, released Oct 24, 2024. Vision Small came out May 15, 2024; Qwen Max came out Apr 3, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen Max Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
