Veo 3.1 Fast vs Wan v2.6
Preferred for text to video: Veo 3.1 Fast · Preferred for image to video: Veo 3.1 Fast · Lowest entry price: Veo 3.1 Fast. Quality scores are blind human-preference votes; specs and prices come from each lab’s listings.
GoogleVeo 3.1 Fast
- Arena1,385
- From$0.08/s
- Max length8 s
Alibaba (Qwen)Wan v2.6
- Arena1,327
- From$0.10/s
- Max length10 s
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Where they differ
Quality is the arena score from blind, side-by-side human votes. Price, length and resolution come from each lab’s own listings.
- Preferred for text to videoVeo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1 Fast 1,362 (#14) · Wan v2.6 1,327 (#21) — blind human votes
- Preferred for image to videoVeo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1 Fast 1,385 (#15) · Wan v2.6 1,310 (#23) — blind human votes
- Lowest entry priceVeo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1 Fast from $0.08/s (720p) · Wan v2.6 from $0.10/s (720p)
- Longest clipsWan v2.6Veo 3.1 Fast: 4, 6 or 8 s · Wan v2.6: 5–10 s
- Highest resolutionVeo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1 Fast: 4K · Wan v2.6: 1080p
- NewestWan v2.6Veo 3.1 Fast Oct 15, 2025 · Wan v2.6 Dec 16, 2025
- Widest inputsWan v2.6Veo 3.1 Fast: Text prompts, Reference images, Video · Wan v2.6: Text prompts, Reference images, Audio, Video
- Native audioBoth generate soundGenerates an audio track with the video: Veo 3.1 Fast yes · Wan v2.6 yes
- Image to videoBoth animate imagesStarts from an uploaded image: Veo 3.1 Fast yes · Wan v2.6 yes
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs and apps
- Most API hostsVeo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1 Fast: 3 · Wan v2.6: 1
Every spec in one table
Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Veo 3.1 FastGoogle | Wan v2.6Alibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Quality (blind human votes) | ||
| Text to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | 1,362 ±10#14 of 48 · 39,484 votes (best) | 1,327 ±7#21 of 48 · 54,050 votes |
| Image to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | 1,385 ±9#15 of 48 · 99,804 votes (best) | 1,310 ±7#23 of 48 · 121,082 votes |
| Price | ||
| Starting price | $0.08/s 720p (best) | $0.10/s 720p |
| Top price | $0.30/s 4K, with audio | $0.15/s 1080p |
| 10-second clip | $0.80at the starting rate (best) | $1.00at the starting rate |
| How it is billed | Per second | Per second |
| Output | ||
| Produces | Video with sound | Video with sound |
| Resolutions | 720p · 1080p · 4K | 720p · 1080p |
| Highest resolution | 4K (best) | 1080p |
| Clip length | 4, 6 or 8 s | 5–10 s |
| Longest clip | 8 s | 10 s (best) |
| Sound | Optional | Optional |
| Frame control | First and last frame | First frame only |
| Aspect ratios | 16:9 · 9:16 | — |
| Inputs | ||
| Text prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Start image (image to video) | Yes | Yes |
| Video input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio input | No | Yes |
| References | — | Video and audio |
| Access | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API hosts | 3 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Oct 15, 2025 | Dec 16, 2025 |
Which should you choose?
Which is better, Veo 3.1 Fast or Wan v2.6?
For text to video, voters prefer Veo 3.1 Fast (Veo 3.1 Fast 1,362 (#14) · Wan v2.6 1,327 (#21)). For image to video, voters prefer Veo 3.1 Fast (Veo 3.1 Fast 1,385 (#15) · Wan v2.6 1,310 (#23)). Arena scores come from blind, side-by-side human votes on the same prompts; when the gap is inside both models’ error margins we call it a tie. Test your own prompts before you commit.
Which is cheaper?
Veo 3.1 Fast costs from $0.08/s (720p), up to $0.30/s (4K, with audio); Wan v2.6 costs from $0.10/s (720p), up to $0.15/s (1080p). A 10-second clip at the lowest rate: Veo 3.1 Fast $0.80, Wan v2.6 $1.00. Prices are list rates and change often; check the lab before budgeting.
How long can the videos be, and at what resolution?
Veo 3.1 Fast: 4, 6 or 8 s, 720p / 1080p / 4K; Wan v2.6: 5–10 s, 720p / 1080p.
What is the difference between Veo 3.1 Fast and Wan v2.6?
Veo 3.1 Fast is a video model from Google (Oct 15, 2025), taking text prompts, reference images and video and producing video with sound. Wan v2.6 is a video model from Alibaba (Qwen) (Dec 16, 2025), taking text prompts, reference images, audio and video and producing video with sound.
Which is newer?
Veo 3.1 Fast Oct 15, 2025; Wan v2.6 Dec 16, 2025.
Which generates video with sound?
Generates an audio track with the video: Veo 3.1 Fast yes; Wan v2.6 yes.
Can I run any of these on my own hardware?
No open weights. Both are available only through APIs and apps.
Related comparisons
- Veo 3.1 Fast vs Sora 2OpenAI · Oct 6, 2025
- Veo 3.1 Fast vs Kling v2.6Kling AI · Dec 3, 2025
- Veo 3.1 Fast vs Seedance v1.0 Pro FastByteDance Seed · Oct 24, 2025
- Wan v2.6 vs Seedance v1.5 ProByteDance Seed · Dec 16, 2025
- Wan v2.6 vs Kling v2.6Kling AI · Dec 3, 2025
- Wan v2.6 vs Grok Imagine VideoxAI · Jan 28, 2026
