Trinity Nano Preview vs Trendyol Asure 12B
Too close to call on our weighted score (Trinity Nano Preview 25, Trendyol Asure 12B 25). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Arcee AITrinity Nano Preview
25/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context131K
Trendyol
Trendyol Asure 12B
25/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.50
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Trinity Nano Preview 25/100, Trendyol Asure 12B 25/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Trendyol Asure 12B on price. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceTrendyol Asure 12BTrendyol Asure 12B $0.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Trinity Nano Preview unpriced
- Longest contextAbout the sameTrinity Nano Preview 131,072 · Trendyol Asure 12B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsTrendyol Asure 12BTrinity Nano Preview: Text · Trendyol Asure 12B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Trinity Nano Preview | Trendyol Asure 12B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 40% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 25/100 | 25/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Trinity Nano PreviewArcee AI | Trendyol Asure 12BTrendyol |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | — | $0.10 |
| Output | — | $0.50 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.20 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | — |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenOpenMDW-1.1 | OpenGemma |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | — | 1 |
| Released | Dec 1, 2025 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Trinity Nano Preview—
- Trendyol Asure 12B$2.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Trinity Nano Preview or Trendyol Asure 12B?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Trinity Nano Preview 25/100, Trendyol Asure 12B 25/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Trendyol Asure 12B on price. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Trinity Nano Preview or Trendyol Asure 12B?
Trendyol Asure 12B is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Trendyol Asure 12B versus . Trinity Nano Preview has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Trinity Nano Preview has not been scored yet and Trendyol Asure 12B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Trinity Nano Preview and Trendyol Asure 12B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Trendyol Asure 12B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Trinity Nano Preview and Trendyol Asure 12B share the same 131,072-token context window. Maximum output per response: Trinity Nano Preview up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Trinity Nano Preview accepts text; Trendyol Asure 12B accepts text and images. Trendyol Asure 12B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (OpenMDW-1.1 and Gemma), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Trendyol Asure 12B is the newest, released Feb 19, 2026. Trinity Nano Preview came out Dec 1, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Ministral 14BThree-way comparison
- Trinity Nano Preview vs Ministral 14BMistral AI
- Trinity Nano Preview vs Nova 2 LiteAmazon
- Trinity Nano Preview vs GLM-4.6VZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Trinity Nano Preview vs GPT-5.2 CodexOpenAI
- Trendyol Asure 12B vs Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed
- Trendyol Asure 12B vs Ministral 14BMistral AI
