Trinity Nano Preview vs Nova 2 Lite
Nova 2 Lite comes out ahead, 72 to 25 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Arcee AITrinity Nano Preview
25/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context131K
- Our pick
AmazonNova 2 Lite
72/100- ECI—
- Price$0.33 / $2.75
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Nova 2 Lite is our pick
Nova 2 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Trinity Nano Preview (25). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNova 2 LiteNova 2 Lite $0.935 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Trinity Nano Preview unpriced
- Longest contextNova 2 LiteNova 2 Lite 1,000,000 · Trinity Nano Preview 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsNova 2 LiteTrinity Nano Preview: Text · Nova 2 Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
- Self-hostingTrinity Nano PreviewPublishes downloadable weights (OpenMDW-1.1)
| Measure | Weight | Trinity Nano Preview | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 25 | 80 |
| Context window | 40% | 24 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 25/100 | 72/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Trinity Nano PreviewArcee AI | Nova 2 LiteAmazon |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | — | $0.33 |
| Output | — | $2.75 |
| Cached input | — | $0.083 |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.935 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Official Amazon Bedrock API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yeslow · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenOpenMDW-1.1 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | amazon.nova-2-lite-v1:0 |
| API providers | — | 2 |
| Released | Dec 1, 2025 | Dec 2, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Oct 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Trinity Nano Preview—
- Nova 2 Lite$8.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Trinity Nano Preview or Nova 2 Lite?
Nova 2 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Trinity Nano Preview (25). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Trinity Nano Preview or Nova 2 Lite?
Nova 2 Lite is cheaper at $0.33 input / $2.75 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.935 per million tokens for Nova 2 Lite versus . Trinity Nano Preview has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Trinity Nano Preview has not been scored yet and Nova 2 Lite has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Trinity Nano Preview and Nova 2 Lite yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova 2 Lite has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Trinity Nano Preview. Maximum output per response: Trinity Nano Preview up to 131,072, Nova 2 Lite up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Trinity Nano Preview accepts text; Nova 2 Lite accepts text, images, PDFs and video. Nova 2 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Trinity Nano Preview publishes its weights (OpenMDW-1.1) and can be self-hosted; Nova 2 Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Nova 2 Lite is the newest, released Dec 2, 2025. Trinity Nano Preview came out Dec 1, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Nova 2 Lite Oct 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
