Trinity Nano Preview vs Mistral Large 3
Mistral Large 3 comes out ahead, 45 to 25 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Arcee AITrinity Nano Preview
25/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context131K
- Our pick
Mistral AIMistral Large 3
45/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Mistral Large 3 is our pick
Mistral Large 3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against Trinity Nano Preview (25). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMistral Large 3Mistral Large 3 $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Trinity Nano Preview unpriced
- Longest contextMistral Large 3Mistral Large 3 262,144 · Trinity Nano Preview 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsMistral Large 3Trinity Nano Preview: Text · Mistral Large 3: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Trinity Nano Preview | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 25 | 50 |
| Context window | 40% | 24 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 25/100 | 45/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Trinity Nano PreviewArcee AI | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | — | $0.50 |
| Output | — | $1.50 |
| Cached input | — | $0.05 |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.75 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenOpenMDW-1.1 | Open |
| API model ID | — | mistral-large-2512 |
| API providers | — | 13 |
| Released | Dec 1, 2025 | Dec 2, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Nov 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Trinity Nano Preview—
- Mistral Large 3$8.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Trinity Nano Preview or Mistral Large 3?
Mistral Large 3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against Trinity Nano Preview (25). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Trinity Nano Preview or Mistral Large 3?
Mistral Large 3 is cheaper at $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.75 per million tokens for Mistral Large 3 versus . Trinity Nano Preview has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Trinity Nano Preview has not been scored yet and Mistral Large 3 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Trinity Nano Preview and Mistral Large 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Large 3 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for Trinity Nano Preview. Maximum output per response: Trinity Nano Preview up to 131,072, Mistral Large 3 up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Trinity Nano Preview accepts text; Mistral Large 3 accepts text and images. Mistral Large 3 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (OpenMDW-1.1), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Mistral Large 3 is the newest, released Dec 2, 2025. Trinity Nano Preview came out Dec 1, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large 3 Nov 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
