Trendyol Asure 12B vs MiMo-V2.5 vs Seed 2.0 Lite
MiMo-V2.5 comes out ahead, 79 to 73 and 54 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Trendyol
Trendyol Asure 12B
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.50
- Context131K
- Our pick
XiaomiMiMo-V2.5
79/100- ECI—
- Price$0.14 / $0.28
- Context1.05M
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Lite
73/100- ECI—
- Price$0.089 / $0.534
- Context256K
MiMo-V2.5 is our pick
MiMo-V2.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 79/100 against Seed 2.0 Lite (73) and Trendyol Asure 12B (54). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5 $0.175 · Trendyol Asure 12B $0.20 · Seed 2.0 Lite $0.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5 1,048,576 · Seed 2.0 Lite 256,000 · Trendyol Asure 12B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsMiMo-V2.5Trendyol Asure 12B: Text, Images · MiMo-V2.5: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Seed 2.0 Lite: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingTrendyol Asure 12B and MiMo-V2.5Publishes downloadable weights (Gemma)
| Measure | Weight | Trendyol Asure 12B | MiMo-V2.5 | Seed 2.0 Lite |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 83 | 86 | 83 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 80 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 61 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 54/100 | 79/100 | 73/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Trendyol Asure 12BTrendyol | MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi | Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.10 | $0.14 | $0.089 (best) |
| Output | $0.50 | $0.28 (best) | $0.534 |
| Cached input | — | $0.0028 (best) | $0.018 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.20 | $0.175 (best) | $0.20 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.134 / $0.802 |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Xiaomi API | Official Volcengine Ark API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | — | 131,072 tokens (best) | 32,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenGemma | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | mimo-v2.5 | doubao-seed-2-0-lite-260428 |
| API providers | 1 | 21 (best) | 6 |
| Released | Feb 19, 2026 | Apr 22, 2026 | Feb 14, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Dec 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Trendyol Asure 12B$2.00
- MiMo-V2.5$1.96
- Seed 2.0 Lite$1.96
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Trendyol Asure 12B, MiMo-V2.5 or Seed 2.0 Lite?
MiMo-V2.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 79/100 against Seed 2.0 Lite (73) and Trendyol Asure 12B (54). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Trendyol Asure 12B, MiMo-V2.5 or Seed 2.0 Lite?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). Trendyol Asure 12B costs $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Seed 2.0 Lite costs $0.089 input / $0.534 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for MiMo-V2.5 versus $0.20 for Trendyol Asure 12B (1.1× as much) and $0.20 for Seed 2.0 Lite (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Trendyol Asure 12B has not been scored yet, MiMo-V2.5 has not been scored yet and Seed 2.0 Lite has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Trendyol Asure 12B, MiMo-V2.5 and Seed 2.0 Lite yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Trendyol Asure 12B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed 2.0 Lite and 131,072 for Trendyol Asure 12B. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2.5 up to 131,072, Seed 2.0 Lite up to 32,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Trendyol Asure 12B accepts text and images; MiMo-V2.5 accepts text, images, audio and video; Seed 2.0 Lite accepts text, images and video. MiMo-V2.5 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Trendyol Asure 12B and MiMo-V2.5 publishes its weights (Gemma) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
MiMo-V2.5 is the newest, released Apr 22, 2026. Trendyol Asure 12B came out Feb 19, 2026; Seed 2.0 Lite came out Feb 14, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2.5 Dec 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
