Seed 2.0 Lite vs Ministral 14B
Seed 2.0 Lite comes out ahead, 73 to 64 on our weighted score.
- Our pick
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Lite
73/100- ECI—
- Price$0.089 / $0.534
- Context256K
Mistral AIMinistral 14B
64/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.20
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Seed 2.0 Lite is our pick
Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Ministral 14B (64). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMinistral 14BMinistral 14B $0.20 · Seed 2.0 Lite $0.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMinistral 14BMinistral 14B 262,144 · Seed 2.0 Lite 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 LiteSeed 2.0 Lite: Text, Images, Video · Ministral 14B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingMinistral 14BPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Seed 2.0 Lite | Ministral 14B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 83 | 83 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 50 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 73/100 | 64/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | Ministral 14BMistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.089 (best) | $0.20 |
| Output | $0.534 | $0.20 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.018 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.20 | $0.20 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Over 32K: $0.134 / $0.802 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Volcengine Ark API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 32,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenApache-2.0 |
| API model ID | doubao-seed-2-0-lite-260428 | — |
| API providers | 6 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Feb 14, 2026 | Dec 2, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Seed 2.0 Lite$1.96
- Ministral 14B$2.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Seed 2.0 Lite or Ministral 14B?
Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Ministral 14B (64). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Lite or Ministral 14B?
Ministral 14B is cheaper at $0.20 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Seed 2.0 Lite costs $0.089 input / $0.534 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Ministral 14B versus $0.20 for Seed 2.0 Lite (1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Seed 2.0 Lite has not been scored yet and Ministral 14B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Seed 2.0 Lite and Ministral 14B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Ministral 14B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed 2.0 Lite. Maximum output per response: Seed 2.0 Lite up to 32,000, Ministral 14B up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Seed 2.0 Lite accepts text, images and video; Ministral 14B accepts text and images. Seed 2.0 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Ministral 14B publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Seed 2.0 Lite is the newest, released Feb 14, 2026. Ministral 14B came out Dec 2, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
