Tiny Aya Earth vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Sarvam 105B
Sarvam 105B comes out ahead, 31 to 27 and 15 on our weighted score, though Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is 37% cheaper per token.
CohereTiny Aya Earth
15/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context8K
Mistral AIVoxtral Small 24B 2507
27/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context33K
- Our pick
Sarvam AI
Sarvam 105B
31/100- ECI—
- Price$0.158 / $0.632
- Context131K
Sarvam 105B is our pick
Sarvam 105B is the better all-round choice, scoring 31/100 against Voxtral Small 24B 2507 (27) and Tiny Aya Earth (15). It leads on context window. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceVoxtral Small 24B 2507Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.175 · Sarvam 105B $0.276 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Tiny Aya Earth unpriced
- Longest contextSarvam 105BSarvam 105B 131,072 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 32,768 · Tiny Aya Earth 8,000 tokens
- Widest inputsVoxtral Small 24B 2507Tiny Aya Earth: Text · Voxtral Small 24B 2507: Text, Audio · Sarvam 105B: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Tiny Aya Earth | Voxtral Small 24B 2507 | Sarvam 105B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 25 | 45 | 35 |
| Context window | 40% | 0 | 0 | 25 |
| Overall | 100% | 15/100 | 27/100 | 31/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Tiny Aya EarthCohere | Voxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AI | Sarvam 105BSarvam AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | — | $0.10 (best) | $0.158 |
| Output | — | $0.40 (best) | $0.632 |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.053 |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.175 (best) | $0.276 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Official Mistral API | Official Sarvam AI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 8,000 tokens | 32,768 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,000 tokens | 32,768 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | Yeslow · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 | OpenApache 2.0 | Open |
| API model ID | tiny-aya-earth | voxtral-small-latest | sarvam-105b |
| API providers | 1 | 10 (best) | 3 |
| Released | Feb 17, 2026 | Jul 15, 2025 | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Tiny Aya Earth—
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507$1.80
- Sarvam 105B$2.84
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Tiny Aya Earth, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 or Sarvam 105B?
Sarvam 105B is the better all-round choice, scoring 31/100 against Voxtral Small 24B 2507 (27) and Tiny Aya Earth (15). It leads on context window. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Tiny Aya Earth, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 or Sarvam 105B?
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Sarvam 105B costs $0.158 input / $0.632 output per million tokens (official Sarvam AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for Voxtral Small 24B 2507 versus $0.276 for Sarvam 105B (1.6× as much). Tiny Aya Earth has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Tiny Aya Earth has not been scored yet, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has not been scored yet and Sarvam 105B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Tiny Aya Earth, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 and Sarvam 105B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Sarvam 105B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 32,768 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507 and 8,000 for Tiny Aya Earth. Maximum output per response: Tiny Aya Earth up to 8,000, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 up to 32,768, Sarvam 105B up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Tiny Aya Earth accepts text; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 accepts text and audio; Sarvam 105B accepts text. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0 and Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Sarvam 105B is the newest, released Feb 18, 2026. Tiny Aya Earth came out Feb 17, 2026; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 came out Jul 15, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
