Tiny Aya Earth vs Solar Pro 2 vs Sarvam 105B
Sarvam 105B comes out ahead, 31 to 26 and 15 on our weighted score, though Solar Pro 2 is 10% cheaper per token.
CohereTiny Aya Earth
15/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context8K
UpstageSolar Pro 2
26/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.25
- Context66K
- Our pick
Sarvam AI
Sarvam 105B
31/100- ECI—
- Price$0.158 / $0.632
- Context131K
Sarvam 105B is our pick
Sarvam 105B is the better all-round choice, scoring 31/100 against Solar Pro 2 (26) and Tiny Aya Earth (15). It leads on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSolar Pro 2Solar Pro 2 $0.25 · Sarvam 105B $0.276 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Tiny Aya Earth unpriced
- Longest contextSarvam 105BSarvam 105B 131,072 · Solar Pro 2 65,536 · Tiny Aya Earth 8,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsTiny Aya Earth: Text · Solar Pro 2: Text · Sarvam 105B: Text
- Self-hostingTiny Aya Earth and Sarvam 105BPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
| Measure | Weight | Tiny Aya Earth | Solar Pro 2 | Sarvam 105B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 25 | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 40% | 0 | 12 | 25 |
| Overall | 100% | 15/100 | 26/100 | 31/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Tiny Aya EarthCohere | Solar Pro 2Upstage | Sarvam 105BSarvam AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | — | $0.25 | $0.158 (best) |
| Output | — | $0.25 (best) | $0.632 |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.053 |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.25 (best) | $0.276 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Official Upstage API | Official Sarvam AI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 8,000 tokens | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,000 tokens | 8,192 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yesminimal · high | Yeslow · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | tiny-aya-earth | solar-pro2 | sarvam-105b |
| API providers | 1 | 2 | 3 (best) |
| Released | Feb 17, 2026 | May 20, 2025 | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Mar 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Tiny Aya Earth—
- Solar Pro 2$3.00
- Sarvam 105B$2.84
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Tiny Aya Earth, Solar Pro 2 or Sarvam 105B?
Sarvam 105B is the better all-round choice, scoring 31/100 against Solar Pro 2 (26) and Tiny Aya Earth (15). It leads on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Tiny Aya Earth, Solar Pro 2 or Sarvam 105B?
Solar Pro 2 is cheaper at $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). Sarvam 105B costs $0.158 input / $0.632 output per million tokens (official Sarvam AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.25 per million tokens for Solar Pro 2 versus $0.276 for Sarvam 105B (1.1× as much). Tiny Aya Earth has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Tiny Aya Earth has not been scored yet, Solar Pro 2 has not been scored yet and Sarvam 105B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Tiny Aya Earth, Solar Pro 2 and Sarvam 105B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Sarvam 105B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 65,536 for Solar Pro 2 and 8,000 for Tiny Aya Earth. Maximum output per response: Tiny Aya Earth up to 8,000, Solar Pro 2 up to 8,192, Sarvam 105B up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Tiny Aya Earth accepts text; Solar Pro 2 accepts text; Sarvam 105B accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Tiny Aya Earth and Sarvam 105B publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; Solar Pro 2 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Sarvam 105B is the newest, released Feb 18, 2026. Tiny Aya Earth came out Feb 17, 2026; Solar Pro 2 came out May 20, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Solar Pro 2 Mar 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
