Solar Pro 2 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B comes out ahead, 54 to 51 on our weighted score, though Solar Pro 2 is 9% cheaper per token.
UpstageSolar Pro 2
51/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.25
- Context66K
- Our pick
NVIDIANemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.65
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is our pick
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against Solar Pro 2 (51). It leads on context window. Solar Pro 2 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSolar Pro 2Solar Pro 2 $0.25 · Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B $0.275 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 262,144 · Solar Pro 2 65,536 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsSolar Pro 2: Text · Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B: Text
- Self-hostingNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Solar Pro 2 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 75 | 73 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 12 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 51/100 | 54/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Solar Pro 2Upstage | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNVIDIA |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.25 | $0.15 (best) |
| Output | $0.25 (best) | $0.65 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.25 (best) | $0.275 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Upstage API | Median of 16 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 65,536 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · high | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | solar-pro2 | — |
| API providers | 2 | 18 (best) |
| Released | May 20, 2025 | Mar 11, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Solar Pro 2$3.00
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B$2.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Solar Pro 2 or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against Solar Pro 2 (51). It leads on context window. Solar Pro 2 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Solar Pro 2 or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B?
Solar Pro 2 is cheaper at $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B costs $0.15 input / $0.65 output per million tokens (median across 16 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.25 per million tokens for Solar Pro 2 versus $0.275 for Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Solar Pro 2 has not been scored yet and Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Solar Pro 2 and Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 65,536 for Solar Pro 2. Maximum output per response: Solar Pro 2 up to 8,192, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Solar Pro 2 accepts text; Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Solar Pro 2 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is the newest, released Mar 11, 2026. Solar Pro 2 came out May 20, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Solar Pro 2 Mar 2025, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B Jun 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteThree-way comparison
- Solar Pro 2 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle
- Solar Pro 2 vs SabaMistral AI
- Solar Pro 2 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
- Solar Pro 2 vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5NVIDIA
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Mistral Small 4Mistral AI
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Sarvam 105BSarvam AI
